Leadership Lessons From The Great Books - True Grit by Charles Portis w/John Hill aka Small Mountain
My name is Jesan Sorrells, and this is the Leadership Lessons from the Great
Books podcast, episode number 98.
Yes. We are crawling, tooth and
nail towards our penultimate 100th
episode. You're gonna wanna be there for that.
With our book today, written by an author who went
to his grave, defying modernity, postmodern
fame culture, and the Internet and social
media. This book was penned by a writer who,
if you were alive and writing today in his thirties, you probably
wouldn't have heard of him because his choices and posture
defied the algorithm that runs so much of our buying
and creating behavior.
The author who, much like his contemporaries Tom Wolf and Nora
Ephron, marched to the beat of his own
drummer. Today, we will be covering we'll
be summarizing. We'll be talking about the ins and outs
of Charles Portis' True Grit.
Now we will be joined on this march into the literary wilderness
at the open of our month of March, with our returning
guest host from episode number 52, when we cover the way of the
samurai by in a zone to Toby, John Hill,
aka small mountain. How are you doing,
John? Dude, I am so ready for this
conversation. Congrats honestly on
getting to 100, first of all, because we need to talk about that. Like, most
people don't do 10 of these kinds of things before they bail. So
98, significant achievement, my friend. Well done.
Well, you know, it's one of those things where I thought
I always had the vision in my head for this show. I I essays thought,
okay. If I could do 5 years' worth of episodes, that's a
corpus. That's a thing. And I can do anything for 5
years even if no one listens to it. Even if I only have, like, a
1000 listeners, it doesn't matter because I did 5 years
of something. And then I can notch that belt, And it's way more than
that, but, you know, I can notch that belt and I can move on with
the rest of my life. And it's like, for me, it's like,
writing a book or cooking a meal. Right. It's something
that's going to take time. It's going to flow over the course of time. And
I'll be honest. There are days when I get up and I come to this
microphone and I'm like, I don't wanna, I don't wanna do this today. But
then I get to talk to awesome people like you and our other guests who
have been on and about halfway in, I'm like, oh no, this
is fine. Actually, I'm usually about 10 minutes in. I'm like, oh, this is fine.
This is, this is going to be interesting. Or I'll get a guest. And
again, all of our guests have been great. Occasionally you will
get a guest where, or you'll get a guest house, like our guest host, Tom
Libby. Who's now our, our almost semi-regular co-hosts are actually
not semi regular. He's our regular co hosts now.
You'll get Tom on and we'll be talking about a book before we hit the
record button and he'll, he'll say something to me like, I don't know how we're
going to get anything out of this book. And then at the end of the
recording, at the end of an hour and a half long conversation, or at the
end of a 2 hour long conversation, he'll look at me at the end of
the recording and he'll say, ah, okay. I
saw it. So okay.
I have a hard question as someone who makes a lot of content and, and
I've also struggled with some of that stuff myself of, like, is this worth doing?
Yeah. Do you think that that is your superpower, is being able
to, like, pull stuff out of people to make the conversation great?
Do you think that that's what makes him a great cohost for you? How do
you split that in your head? I think
that like most things in the content
creation business, and you and I were talking a little bit about this before we
hit record. People are always looking for the hack or the
shortcut or the thing that will, and this is why we're going to cover true
grit today. The thing that will make the algorithm like them. And I
don't I've never cared about any of that nonsense.
I don't really care if the algorithm likes me or not. I don't really care
if I get 10,000 likes on a platform. Would I
like to get that for sure? I'd be crazy to say no, that I don't
want that. Not where I don't want that for the show, but
I'm going to keep doing this regardless of what the algorithm
says. I'm going to keep doing this quite frankly, if I get no
feedback from it, or if I get a lot of feedback from it, or if
I get a little bit of feedback from it, because I believe in the show,
I believe in the value of what we're doing here. And so I think that's
my super. I also think that,
the, and this is the dark side of that. The dark side of this is
sometimes it could be a little bit self indulgent. So you're going to have to
like work, watch out for that. And there have been some episodes that I've done
where I did step back a little bit and I was like, well,
I could have pulled some more out of that for other people versus that just
being, you know, kind of, oh, I'm gonna do this for myself and it'll be
fine. But, but I'm constantly going into
the books looking for what can I give our
listeners? What can I give a person who 10 years
from now might pick up this might pick up this in a search for a
particular book? This will pop up on Google. They'll be like, oh, I didn't know
what that is click and they'll listen to it and they'll go, oh, I didn't
know that this particular insight could be pulled from this book. That's the game I'm
I'm playing. So I love them. And I I think I think that the order
of operations there is the important part. Right? You said,
you know, would I like to have those kind of results? Yes. But you're not
making your content purposefully to go try to capture those results
because the work itself is worth doing in the way that you're doing
it. Plus, I think that
I was actually going to post this on Facebook today and then I decided not
Tom, but it is an insight that I think is
worthwhile. It probably should have more, more traction
or more popularity. But it is an eye. It is this
idea that these large language
algorithms that we're using to
aggregate all of the
teratrillion of information that we've put on the internet in the
last 40 years in the Western world anyway.
Those algorithms are going to expose who's real and who's
fake. 100%. 100%. And,
and the people who are real, And I mean, genuine people who are
genuinely real. And we already saw this a little bit with Google Gemini, not to
date this podcast, but if you're listening to this in the future, you may want
to go Google, go Google that. But,
you're going to see who's real and who's fake. You're going to see
what people are doing. That's that's genuine and actually making a
real connection and a real human style level of engagement
versus people who are just playing. Quite frankly, playing the
algorithm game in order to get virality and then to just take off and
go. And I would, I would, I would also say that What those
large language algorithms will do is it will separate the leaders from the followers and
the leaders, the leadership and leaders have always been a tiny group,
but my fear is that that group is just gonna get smaller
rather than the franchise expanding. And we need the franchise to expand.
That's a super interesting point because,
you know, I try to go watch the longest form
content, read the longest form content I can because I know how easy it is
to get good writers. Right? I know how easy it is to sound like, you
know, you're talking about over a 32nd clip, which is why,
like, I love the Rogen style format, those super
long forms because, like, if they run out of talking points,
you know. You can hear it. Right? Like, some of the people who,
I'm not fans of. I'm not gonna list any names out here. But, I love
to go watch their long form shows because it's like, let's see if you can
hold it together for longer than 3 minutes. Because if not, I now
know kinda really where you are in the grand scheme of things, and no
judgment. Right? Like, you know, it's great. You can have great writers, but
I only wanna deal with people whose, like, IP is actually attached
in a meaningful way. Well, and we talk we're we're we're we're we
talk a little bit about this. We've talked a little bit about this, without going
too much into the details of like the secret, not really secret sauce, because there
was no secret sauce, but sort of the nuts and bolts of the show. Right?
This show, yeah, I write a script. Like the show is dead simple. I read
a book, I write a script, I send it to the guest. The guest has
areas where they can comment. We have a conversation before we start and then we
press record and go. And then I read the book or read excerpts from the
book or increasingly, read summaries of the book because I want to go get
through the whole thing. And then we talk about a bad book and forth, bring
forth ideas, pull things from it, and then we move on. It's dead
simple.
But dead simple and holding
someone for 2 hours or 4 hours. Like you and I have talked for
4 hours and we talked for 4 hours about a book that was.
What a 100 pages, maybe me and motors, massashi's, you know, a book of 5
rings, that's maybe a 100 pages, maybe. Short re short read for
sure. But when you look at the lasting impact of it, you look at, you
know, like, it doesn't have to be long, which is
something I'm I'm always trying to be better about myself because I am not
succinct in my writers, in my content creation, or anything. And so
one of the coolest things about it is we can talk for 4 hours, and
we can probably go again for 4 hours. Right? We could bring we could bring
another actual practice martial artist, and we could go for 12 hours
because of the depth of that book. Right? Oh, yeah. Which I think is
important to to keep in mind that it doesn't have to be long. It
doesn't have to be, you know, thinking fast and slow by Conumen for it
to, like, have value. You know, sometimes it's just a slog
because it needs to be a slog, but choosing to force everyone on
a slog because you can't do it a different way also
has some limitations. Well and and you talk about long form
versus short form. For me, the content that particularly in the
podcasting space that is not working these essays,
And God bless all the people who are doing it and who are struggling, but
there's a massive tranche between. The people who were doing
micro short content. And we do, by the way, we have these 2 formats on
our show. So we have the micro, you know, 6 to 10 minute sometimes.
Well, 2 to 4 minute, 4 to 6 minute at Tom max 10
minutes, micro content that you can just pick up. And it's just me talking,
no guests, no music, just going. Then we, we, we
cross the trench and we go up the J curve all the way into
that 4 hour space, which has names in it
that John is not going to name. I'm not going to name. It's okay. You
know who they are. You could find them. Right?
And it and and and in between those two polls are a
bunch of people doing half hour, an hour long shows. Yep. And
and God bless people who are in the leadership development space. I'm
not quite sure how you can talk effectively about leadership. And I'm
going to say it, I'm going to say it, and maybe I don't get invited
as a guest onto those shows, and and maybe that's fine. I've got my own
show. It's cool. But I don't know how you cover the depth and
breadth of leadership in under in in 30 minutes. I don't know how
you do it or in an hour. I genuinely don't. And that's
and maybe it's because I'm just not good enough to be that succinct. That might
be it. Just like you, I'm not succinct either. I like long conversations with
interesting people. So maybe it's a me problem, not a problem of the format.
But I do see a lot of those shows in that in that deep
that deep ditch between what's happening at the 4 hour
end, what's happening at the, at the 10 minute end at that micro micro end.
And it seems like that's a place where a lot of shows go to die.
And I I I'd never wanted that for this show. So Man, I
cannot tell you how many times I've gotten feedback because I've done a
couple of hour long things. Right? We had a podcast and then the live stream,
and they were longer because I I like the longer conversation as
well. And the advice from everyone, oh, man, you gotta make it shorter. You gotta
make it shorter. I don't wanna make it shorter. I want the depth. You know?
And, we're launching a new show, and it's supposed to be about an hour long.
But I'm choosing very intentionally, at least on the front end, people who I
know have the traits and characteristics of
a long form conversation. They're deep, they're thoughtful,
extremely aware of themselves. Right? They're not trying to be too
polished and professional because I think that if you if you,
in poker, this is called bum hunting. But in poker, you're trying to find the
easiest opportunities to make money that you possibly can. So
I wanna make a really high level show with deep thinkers and people
sharing kind of what has worked for them. So at least
during development, since the show is not live yet, you know, I'm being very
intentional reaching out to people who I know already make good content, already are
capable of having really deep conversations without it needing to be 3
hours. Because I do think that some people will they need that time to walk
into the depth, and then some people are just ready to jump in from Yeah.
From the deep side. You know? So I'm trying to shortcut that a little bit
because I do know how much time it takes to, like, you know,
to get people excited about a 3 hour show. Right? I know it's not for
everybody, but, you know, I'm also trying to,
interview, like, revenue people. So, like, hey, can I have can I have half of
your day? No. No. Which
is fair and fine. I get it. You know? Because because, honestly, if it takes
half a day as me, as the interviewer, to get greatness out of
people, I'm I don't think I'm doing a very good job as an interviewer. Right?
As an interviewer. Yeah. So I think I think that that's the other part of
it is who is getting value out of it? If no one is getting
value out of it, then, you know, then, you know, there's some hard questions.
But Yeah. Distribution and the algorithm do play a big part on, like, is
anyone getting value out of it kinda thing. You know? Exactly. Exactly.
Yeah. We can, we could talk about this all day, but I'm sure people would
like to hear about the book. I mean, compared to us complaining about, like,
algorithmic issues, I'm sure that everyone would rather hear about this book. Everyone would rather
hear about this book. And, and Charles Podcast and
his literary life. So, let's do that. Let's
so let's let's do that. Let's pick up with, let's pick up with true grit.
So, this is an excellent
book. This is an excellent novel. It is
probably one of my top
5 at minimum, top ten at max
books. Oh, yeah. And
there's many, many reasons for why I love this book.
But let me start off for those of you who have never read it. Maybe
you haven't seen either of the films. I also have a an object here that
I'm gonna share for folks who are watching the video, I'm gonna show you something
that I pulled out of a, I pulled out of a shop in Texas.
So Charles Podcast and, and true grit, true grit begins.
Now the movie actually, the Joel and Ethan Cohen movie begins with
a quote from Proverbs, Proverbs 28, 1, the wicked
flee when no one pursues. Now there's a
comma there or semi colon, depending upon which version of the Bible you're
reading. And then there's, there's a, there's another line behind there,
which the Cohen brothers did not put at the, in the opening their cold open
to the film, which I think is actually important for what Portis was
trying to get to in this book. So Proverbs
28, one, the wicked flee when no one pursues, but the righteous
are as bold as a lion.
When you open up true grit, Charles Podcast begins
with Maddie Jesan. And, he opens up with
this description. People do not give it credence that a 14 year old girl could
leave home and go off in the literature to avenge her father's book. But it
did not seem so strange then, although I will say it did not happen every
day. I was just 14 years of age when a coward going
by the name of Tom Chaney shot my father down at Fort Smith,
Arkansas, and robbed him of his life and his horse and
$150 in cash money plus 2 California gold
pieces that he carried in his trouser band. And from
there, from that compound sentence, we are off. Maddie
Ross is the driver for this book.
Now her perspective is one of a middle aged
woman looking back on what happened to her when she was a teenager,
kind of a little bit with incredulity, kind of a little bit with righteousness.
And we're gonna talk about her Sorrells, her sense of moral righteousness because that's a
huge driver for everything that happens in this in this
novel. But you begin to see just
how just how righteous she is
when, she gets on the train and
takes the train, from from Yale County,
all the way to, all the way to Fort Smith, Arkansas, and
begins Tom, well, she begins to walk
around and start talking to people and begins to assert herself,
in in a way that only a 14 year old girl, who has
no knowledge of sort of how the world is, quote, unquote, supposed to work
does. Now I have, you know, full full disclosure. I have
a 14 year old girl, a 13 year old girl who lives in my house.
And so, eats my food. And so I
know what I'm talking about here. And, there's a certain
level of moral authority that she brings to all of her
interactions. In particular, her interactions with
the, the man who owns the, who
owns the, well,
he owns the the wagon loading
place slash horse trading place, right, horse
trading location, in Fort Smith, a man
named colonel, Stonehill. And she goes
back and forth with colonel Stonehill, about the,
about the value of the horses, about the value of the ponies. By the way,
this is demonstrated both in both versions of this book that
we're turning to the movie, one starring, Jeff
Bridges. That's the Ethan Cohen film that was just recently released. And
then, of course, the the the older film with,
with your friend in mine, John Wayne.
And, and she threatens colonel Stonehill with the attorney. She
threatens him with lawyer Jane Noble Daggett of Dardanelle, Arkansas.
And and and she threatens him in such a way
that he
well, he's got his own principles of negotiation and what he
wants to get for the horses, and she's got her own principles.
And the principles meet and clash.
And the thing that you see in the first part of this
book is that Maddie Ross
and I'm going to be very gentle about this. Maddie Ross is no Gen Z
er stuck to her phone. She's no millennial who wants to
be liked by everybody. She is fine with being disagreeable.
She's okay with that. And that sets the tone for many,
many things that happened later, including,
the entire, testimony that,
Rooster Cogburn, who was introduced in this first part as well,
gives, in a trial where he
shot 2 men and then maybe or maybe
not moved them to a fire. And, of
course, when she meets rooster coming
out of the trial after he has been, questioned,
by the lawyer about how many men he has killed
and whether or not he always works in
reverse when he's backing up. She says to
him, and of course, this is the title of the book. They tell me you
are a man with true grit. He
actually doesn't know what she means. And by the way, both Jeff Bridges and John
Wayne nailed this part about rooster Cogburn's character,
but they nailed it in different ways. He actually doesn't understand what
she means because he is who he
is.
Let's open up with the literary life of Charles Portis. So who was the guy
who wrote this book? Well, Charles Mccole Portis was born December
28, 1933 and died February 17,
2020. Yeah, that's right. He died before everything kicked
off with COVID. And, he was an American
writers. And now this is directly from his Wikipedia entry, which is
very, very slim. I think Portis would have actually really,
really liked this. He was the literary peer of Toni Morrison,
Philip Roth, and, interestingly enough, the man he's always compared to,
Cormac McCarthy, which, by the way, eventually, at a certain point, we will read The
Road, on this podcast. We'll get to that.
Charles Portis lived, observed, and was hyper aware of the contradictions and
complexities of the American south and west and the real people
who lived there doing real things. Now Portis
wrote 5 books total. His 2 most famous were Norwood, written
in 1966, and, of course, True Grit in 1968.
And he is an author who was well,
he had his own sense of weirdness.
And I quote, as Tom Wolf says in the new journalism,
one day Podcast suddenly quit as London correspondence for the Herald
Tribune. Now he was a he started off as a journalist. Right?
That was generally regarded as a very choice job in the newspaper business.
This is Tom Wolf speaking. Portis quit cold one day, just
like that without warning. And after writing his first two novels, Portis
actually went out to went on to live the fantasy, Wolf says. Portis did it
in a way that was so much like the way it happens in the dream.
It was unbelievable. He sold both books to the movies.
He made a fortune, and
then he moved into a fishing shack in Arkansas.
It was Tom, pardon my use of the word, it was too
damned perfect to be true, and yet there it was, which
is to say that the old dream, the novel has never died.
Close quote. By the way, Portis made
$14,000,000 from the movie adaptation of true grit
with John Wayne. And that was $14,000,000 in 1960s, 19
seventies money. And I quote also from
Justin Taylor in old wheeled America who was writing in 2023,
quote, Hortus is a comedian of the highest order, but he is finally, as
all comedians must be, a moral philosopher. Because
comedy, like prophecy, is always grounded in a critique of the
world as it is based on a vision of the
world as it ought be. And that comes
through, I think, tremendously in his character of Mattie
Ross, and less so in his character of
Rooster Cogburn. And then there's
this. So I am holding up
for those of you who are going to be watching the video. I
found in a junk shop in Central
Texas the original,
Capitol record
soundtrack to the original true grit starring John
Wayne, Glenn Campbell, and Kim Darby as Mattie
Ross. On the back, of course, is the
pictures of the, of the folks, and all the songs on here are
sung by Glenn Campbell. Now in the Joel Ethan Coen film,
Glenn Campbell's role was played by Matt Damon. Matt Damon did not sing.
John Wayne's part was played by Jeff Bridges. I already brought that up. And, of
course, Kim Darby's part was played by Hailey Steinfeld. I hope
I'm saying her name correctly. But this is, this is a
great, album. Side 1 is true grit with vocals by
Glenn Campbell, Rooster, Maddie and Literature Blackie, a
dastardly d, d, papa's things, side 2 is true grit,
Chen Lee in the general, big trail, Cogburn country, and then, of course, true
grit b side vocals by Glenn Campbell. So I'm holding it up on the
video. It has a great cover. I've been holding on to this for the last
6 months because I knew I was gonna be doing this podcast, and I've been
waiting to show it to John and he is laughing right now on the video.
You'll be able to see it because it is an example of old, weird America.
I just I could not when I found this from Paramount Pictures,
when I found that album, I was, my wife was like, what are you doing?
We don't even have a record player at home. And I was like, I need
to get this, though. It doesn't matter. I need to have this. So I have
it now. So with that, I'd like to kick it over
to John. Go ahead. Yeah. I you know, you said
you had something to show me, but you didn't give me any advanced
notice, which I now appreciate. But I do feel a little bit
broadsided by this because, me and my wife are
big record collectors. And every time we go anywhere, including antique stores,
she's digging, digging, digging. Like, doesn't care about
anything else other than salt and pepper shakers and old vinyls. Like, it's
crazy. And so we have quite the collection here. She would lose her mind.
And we were rewatching the movies over the weekend and readers some
trivia and going a little bit deeper about it. And, Glenn Campbell
is quoted as saying, you know what? Before that movie, I've never I've
never acted in a movie. Upon seeing it, my record is
still the same, which made
me so like, I
like, I saw that movie at a time. Right? Like like, my my
my mom and my grandmother are are both huge John Wayne fans.
Okay? So I had seen the movie is, like, part of learning
about the greatness of John Wayne. Right? So Yeah. My my grandmother
was just obsessed with, like, the western style of John Wayne, not so
much the war stuff, but, you know, McClintock. I'm a quiet man. And
then, you know, they're always saying, like, fill your hands. You know? Like, this kind
of this thing. And then I was like, where is this from? And then we
watched the movie. I didn't read the book until leaders, and it was kind
of a because the the original movie doesn't really follow
the book as closely as the Coen version does, which I kind of forgot
about. Yeah. No. It does not. And that was, by the way, a
a knock against the original movie is that it seemed too much of a John
Wayne vehicle. Yeah. Because it's not it's not really meant
to be about him. If anything, he's he's the belligerent
antihero. Right. But I think that
and I'll go ahead and say it early. I think the thing that the John
Wayne film has that the Joel and Ethan Cohen film doesn't
is that sense of
that sense of moral righteousness. Like, there are some there there there's
there's elements that are in the book. And, yes, the Ethan Coghlan
the Joel and Ethan Coghlan book or movie heumes very
closely to the book. But Joel and Ethan I think it was Joel
Joel Joel Cohen that wrote. I don't think it was Ethan. I think Ethan produced
that one, although I might be wrong. I'd have to go back and look. But,
I think they stripped the more moralistic elements out of
it. And without that, which you do get in Kim Darby, by the
way, you do get in her in her portrayal of, of Maddie
Ross, you do get the sense that she's
a moral actor in the world. And her moralism comes from
and we're gonna talk about this a lot today, but it comes from a particular
a particular spot in her in her perception of
the world. You know? Agreed. And you Yeah. And you kinda get at the end
of the Joel Ethan Cohen movie when when as an and as a middle
aged lady, you know, and I'm not giving anything away here because you can go
watch the movie, but, you know, she she walks up to,
oh gosh, the old west shooting show or whatever. And, Frank
James doesn't get up. She's like, don't get up, trash. Yeah. You
know? You know? But there were elements of that all throughout the book where she
was talking to people like that the whole time. 100%. We
my wife and I watched both of them again, and I was kinda talking about
the pacing differences between the two films. Right? Because the first one is so much
more back story and everything. The newer version, yeah, I would say is
closer to the book as far as like the overall view, but the pacing of
it is very different. But the John Wayne one does do
a better job of like showing that no matter what had happened
to her father, Maddie would have carried out those same actions.
Whereas in the Jesan movie, it kinda seems like, hey. Like, it got you
know, she seems a very stalwart, right, person. Right?
It's a great word. But it kind of seems like she's
almost forced into this because of the nature of events. Whereas I think the first
one does a much better job of being like, Hey, this is just who she
is and she's going to move people, you know? And, I think,
I think there's weight to that because I, I, I do think that a lot
of people are much more concerned about being themselves and being direct and
different things like that. And when you're not brought up to be that,
it's harder to step into that spot and when when and if you have Tom,
professionally speaking. Right? Right. Because Maddie was brought up
as the smartest person, you know, on that farm. She's handling the book.
She's doing all these things. She is brought up with a with a lane of
authority that creates this righteousness and and, you know,
thinking that I think most people today don't have until they find it
much, much later professionally. Well and and, you know, Kim
Darby was I mean, she was in her twenties. Yeah. She was
21 when they when they made that thing. And, apparently,
John Wayne was not a fan of her because he wanted his daughter to be
in that role, and they told him no. And so, apparently, they didn't say,
like, 2 words off camera to each other, which is kind of an interesting thing.
But, apparently, John Wayne was not the greatest human on set, you know,
just going back and looking at some of that stuff. Not here to judge the
guy. Not you know? I wasn't there. But It it book me many years. You
talk about growing up with your your grand your grandmother being a really big fan
of John Wayne. So we're it's weird.
So, in my family, my
father was a huge fan of Clint Eastwood, but didn't care a whit
about John Wayne. And, and it kind of Sorrells makes sense
because my father was from me. My father was born in, in the in the
the, late 19 forties. And so Mhmm. For
African Americans in the late 19 forties were born at that time and then came
of age in the late sixties and went to Vietnam in the seventies,
yeah, they grew up watching John Wayne, but it was more like an American
institution that was representative of, quite frankly,
white male culture. And they and they wouldn't have framed it that way. That's how
we frame it now. They would have just said, John Wayne is racist Doesn't like
black people. That's how they would have framed it. And they would have just moved
on with the rest of their lives. Right. Whereas Libby Eastwood seemed a
lot more. Oriented. You're right. A lot
more realistic. That's interesting. I've never thought about that before. I've
never really been a Clint fan. Like, I've never really done the
job. It's never really done anything to me. And honestly, like, rewatching
this and, like, recently rewatched McClintock
recently for, like, the first time in years, many, many, many
years. And, I'm like, oh, yeah. That doesn't have the same pull on
me that it used to. Right? Yeah. I don't know how much of that is
just age or that being out of time or my shifts.
Just I think it's probably all of that, but I also think
that John Wayne
is fundamentally in a different way than Clint Eastwood fundamentally
essays going to be, a frozen
in his own era. Yeah. And and because because the
movies he made, it's easier to kind of put them off to the side, I
would say. Right. Right? Because, like, everything is about him being larger than life. Right?
Like, you watch, like, Writers and even The Shootist, which is, like Mhmm. Like
like that's that's movie star movies from a guy
who's, like, the first movie star almost. Whereas Correct. You
know, the way that they've worked with, like, Clint and everyone else now,
they're way more approachable. They're they're they're human beings in and of themselves a lot
of times. Well, not only that, but, like, Clint also did movies
that were much more of a challenge for him
because he couldn't step over John Wayne. Yeah. John Wayne was too
big a star, so we had to go to Italy. You know? He he did
raw hide in the fifties, couldn't get hired to do anything in
America, runs across Sergio Leone and goes to
Italy. You know? And he's like, okay. Well this. Yeah. He's handling that information
for me. Yeah. He's doing the movie's there. And it was
there that he figured out, I think, although he's never said it,
but I think it was there. He figured out that, oh, there's something more to
this movie game than just showing up and being the guy from raw
high. That's fundamentally
different. And and actually, I would trace Eastwood's growth and
direction alongside or parallel to sort of
the new directors, when they were new of Scorsese,
Spielberg, Lucas, well, Lucas was Spielberg and
Lucas were the next generation, but Scorsese, what's his name,
who did Apocalypse Now? Coppola, thank you. Knew eventually I would have it.
But Scorsese, Coppola. I like how you thank yourself.
Thanks me for the help. I would like to
thank me for showing up every day.
But it's it's this it's this parallel
idea in in Eastwood's career that you don't just have to be
a movie star. Right? There's not just one path. There's all these other
paths. John Wayne was very happy being directed by John Ford.
He was very happy being the the guy. Yeah. He just wanted to be
handled. He just wanted to be handled. Yeah. He didn't wanna
and, you know, we're speaking a little bit of the school because the because the
guy's gone, you know, but, like, eventually but you see this with everybody, though.
Right? They build the team. Right? DiCaprio
loves, you know, working in Scorsese films, and Scorsese loves writing
films for him because he knows what he's capable of doing and stuff. And, you
know, I I sometimes see people go after people. Right? Because even the
Coen Writers have their regulars who they love to have in movies and stuff like
that. And people are like, can't you find someone new? It's like when you know
who to write for, like, and you and you
can trust them with the book. You know? There's there's something
special and unique that if you've not created something creative that has to
be performed by someone else that you probably don't actually understand yet.
Now once again, we have talked about the movies, so we have not talked about
Podcast. Portis would be happy about this. He'd be like, yeah, that's fine. I'm gonna
take my $14,000,000 Tom go to my shack in Arkansas. Absolutely.
I love that about Charles Portis. I love it that he only
wrote 5 novels. I love it that he said the $14,000,000 was
enough. I'm going to retreat and go do the thing. Like
there's a, there's a, there's an article in one of the links that I sent
you or an essays. One of the links that I sent you, I think it's
from, it's not for old weird America. It might be from the literary hub
where they were trying to reach out to him. The author, the journalist was trying
to reach out to him and, you know, he's like,
well, I mean, yeah, you can come to Arkansas and interview me if I have
time in my day. And you could always find him at the bar, like having
a drink, just hanging out. And no one would know that he was Charles
Fortis. The man had 0, apparently social media presence didn't care about
any of that nonsense. I'm sure the Cohen's
reached out to him and his essays, when they,
when they did the, when they did the film and I'm sure he was like,
yeah, that's fine. Just make sure the check is signed with my name.
I never had a wife. He never had kids. He just wrote his books
and hung out and fish. And I think that that's what got, what got Tom
Wolf. I think that's what got taught because Tom Wolf is so the opposite. Tom
Wolf wanted to be.
Well, you mentioned handled. Right? He wanted to be handled by the New York
literature press folks. Right. Bonfire. I mean, you don't
write a book like bonfire of the vanities where you're just lambasting everybody in New
York in the eighties without wanting to attract some attention to yourself. I'm Sorrells. On
the other hand, everything that I've read about the man,
he didn't care about any of that. And by the way, dollars
14,000,000 the interest on $14,000,000
is fine. The interest payment is enough to feed you for a year. What do
you what do you need? You have you have no expenses. Well, I mean, in
one of those articles you sent me, it talked about that he got $300,000 at
the time just for the rights of that movie. Like Mhmm. That man doesn't need
to do anything else. If he's already, like, kind of planted the flag and said,
you know what? I don't wanna do it this way anymore. Like Mhmm. I
think I think there's a big story here for everyone who is, like, starting a
business right now, because I think there's a lot of people who were deluding
themselves Tom points of failure because they're trying to
go build a big, huge conglomerate and things. That way it's going to be sexy
and everything else like that. When really you just need to show up and do
your job. Right? Do the writing, do the outreach. Writers? Whatever
that looks like. It doesn't have to be great and sexy, but it
needs to book. You know? And there's a lot of
people, I think, right now who we were kinda talking about this before we hit
record. They're doing it for the star power. They're not doing it for the sake
of the work itself. And the thing that I I I appreciate this about this
book and, the essays you sent over because I read
them gave me a whole new perspective on the guy because I don't really know
that much about Portus. That this book, like, this book, my
copy of it is, you know, because we're collectors. You know?
And Mel had read it as well, and so she came home with this very
old version. I don't even know the date on this thing of mine, but and
we're it's just always been on the thing, but I've never read anything else by
him yet, but I'm going to now. And
it's just if you're doing it for the sake of the
work, it shows up differently than when you're doing
it, like, the star power kind of, like, situation. And and we see this with
actors, and we see this with musicians. We see this with
everybody who's doing anything. There's the there's the marketing path. There's the, hey,
look at me path. And then there's the, hey, like, I do good work and
I don't care if you like it or not. And sometimes they can be together.
But more often than not, you do have to kind of go pick
1 or the other. This is something that I have been hit
with with hit with as
feedback, particularly sharply in the last couple of years.
So consistently over the course of my career, such as
it were, the last 20 years of me doing stuff, I've
always been accused intermittently, usually of being
spread too thin, which sometimes I am like currently I'm probably spread too
thin, and not focusing on one thing nearly enough.
And if I just focused on this one thing, I'd be genius. Okay.
And, and, and really in the last couple of years and within the last 6
months, people have been coming to me saying, if you just focused on this, you're
just focused on this. You're just focused on this. And
I've always pushed back on that. And by the way, it's
personal feedback. It's also professional feedback. So it's becoming at me for a lot of
different areas. Right. And I always push back on that by saying, thank you.
I appreciate your perspective on what I'm doing out here. I'm
peripatetic. I have multiple different interests in a lot of different areas, and I
like to do a lot of different things. And
I'm focused on doing the work for the sake of the work. And I like
it, how you made that distinction. I'm doing the work for the sake of the
work. I'm not doing the work for all of these other multiplicity
of things. I'm doing the work to get famous. I mean, if fame
comes, okay, I'll take it. But I'm not doing that.
I would be doing these 5 things that I'm doing currently
If anybody were paying attention to me or not. 1000%. Because this
is the book. Yeah. For me, that's the work. And I get it for you.
You have to, you know, put on a suit and get in a car and
drive somewhere, or maybe you put on your flip flops and you show up on
camera and you get on Zoom somewhere. Like, whatever you gotta do, I
get it. And that's the only thing you have in your in your psychological space
to handle. I get that. That's okay. I
can handle multiple things in my psychological space. I'm
okay. But are all those things aren't paying you?
I I really do. You let you let me worry you let me worry about
that. Yeah. I, you know, I, you know, if you
have the view of my bank accounts, then, you know, we can we can talk
about all the data points. Right? Which is the other part that people kinda
get lumped in with this. Like, I'm, the thing that I've learned about myself,
is that if I don't have an outlet of some way, shape, or form and
for a long time, that was martial arts, and before that, it was poker. For
a long time, it was those things together. But when I stopped training martial arts
in my first school, it was as I was starting this business. Right? And I
also was not playing poker. So what that meant was all
all all of my focus, all of my thinking, all of
my concerns and fears and you know, was put into
just this very small box, which is my business.
Right? And, if I don't have a puzzle
to work on, I will create one inside of the business. Right?
Mhmm. And my grandmother who passed away, in February 2020,
she's the one who was the the reason why I read true grit and and
have seen all these John Wayne movies. One time I was working at a job
and she goes, what happens when you get it figured out? Right? Because I job
hopped a lot. Right? As a salesperson, you know, it's not quite as detrimental to
job hop. And I was like, what do you mean? She's like, you're gonna get
bored, and you're gonna figure this out, and then you're gonna get bored. What happens
then? You know? And, you know, I was 24, 25, and
I was avoidant of this quality about myself. So I was like, no.
No. Those other jobs were were garbage, bad leadership, bad
bosses, you know, all this other stuff. And she was like, okay.
And, like, was just can can fine leaving it just
like that. You know? Fast forward, you know, she's gone. I'm doing some journaling and
thinking, and and this comes back of, like, holy crap.
I need the puzzle. I need something to engage
my mind in a worthwhile way. And when I don't have it in front of
me, I will create it. So to that end, the past
year, I've been practicing guitar. I got a guitar, and I'm working with a
coach, and I'm also starting to do woodworking as, like, a as a more
physical outlet because guitar is great, super great for my brain and my
thinking and stuff like this, but it wasn't it wasn't in my body
enough to really kind of take over for the martial arts. So now,
actually, this weekend, I spent kind of building my workbench for the
garage because I'm gonna get into, you know, woodturning and building
bowls and cool stuff like that just as another way to
have a puzzle outlet. So that way I don't create it inside of my business.
But I I think, first of all, I think if you're
running a business and you're not making content, you're choosing to make it difficult for
no great reason except your ego. And when you can make your content around the
things you'd be doing anyway, like the work, you know, reading the books
that you would be reading anyway, taking the like, publishing the notes you would be
writing anyway, publishing the interviews with other peers in the same spot who are
capable of having qualified conversations, why not make
that content? You know, why not try to help out, help out other people?
And that's when I think it really gets beautiful and good. But I think when
you're making content, because, like, you think it's gonna help the business, not because it's
something you're you're really invested in doing is when you start trying to chase that
star path. Right? And then it's gonna hurt when you wake up and
realize that the, that the sexy business thing that you're trying to make sexy, but
also keep real is not hitting either one of these marks. It also
moves you away from the fame machine that social media is.
1000%. For sure. And this is the
this is the love hate. And I don't know. I I really shouldn't say
love. It's neutral than hate for me. It really is. It's neutral than
hate. Most of the Tom, I'm neutral about social media platforms because I
readers they're businesses and they're gonna do what they're gonna do. Mhmm. It's fine. Algorithm
gonna algorithm, to paraphrase. Right? Like, it's fine.
Whatever. And,
I'll post content and I know content gets suppressed. I'm not complaining about it
because algorithm going to algorithm. It's fine.
But when you're creating content for the business and the content
is a lead generator to something else, because it has to serve a purpose.
Now you're going to get caught in the, in the, in the virality trap. You're
going to get caught in the space of trying to do what
TikTok wants, which is not what's best for your
business. It's not what's best for your leadership or your team. It's what's best
for TikTok. And I think that that's a point that's been made
multiple times by multiple people, and it always needs to be
made again because your people need to hear it. Absolutely. Writers? There's always a vanity
metric, and there's always a metric that matters. You know? I have a I have
a podcast. It's a 0.01% podcast in the world of sales and
business. Right? We have 85 episodes and everything else like that. But in the grand
scheme of things, you say those things, it's not that big.
It's really not. And to your point, I think, I
think the other side of this that we're kind of not talking about is that
if you post enough, if you create for long enough, you know, your sample size
becomes indicative of what you should be expecting. Writers. Right. And
the thing that you said a second ago about doing this for 5 years, I
can do anything for 5 years, and then I'll know. Like, that is you collecting
a big enough sample so that you're not lying to yourself. You're not choosing someone
else's best practices over what you're able to do. And I talk
about this with people because I post about consultative selling,
not flashy selling, not high pressure selling. I don't talk about marketing. I don't talk
about all these other things that people are, like, super excited about. I talk about
having better sales conversations, which most people are trying to get away
from sales conversations entirely. Right? They'd rather market all the way to conversion
versus, like, having to have a conversation with people. Yeah.
So I'm not gonna get the reach that other people are, but when you do
it, I've been posting daily on LinkedIn since 2017,
2016, somewhere around there. Like, I can go look at my data
now and I can tell when I'm actually being algo suppressed versus like, I'm just
not writers well, you know, I'm not connecting with the actual people who
normally read my stuff. Because if you do enough to actually
collect a collect a benchmark, the benchmark stands on its own
merit. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Sometimes it's you and sometimes
it's the algorithm, but very often, if you're going
to take ownership, we actually just did a short episode about this. If you're going
to be a leader, you need to take ownership and accountability. And of course
it doesn't start with the algorithm. It starts with Absolutely.
You. Just like with Maddie Ross, it started with her. Just like with Rooster
Cogburn, it started with him.
Real quick. What I love Yeah. Is they talk about this very
topic in the book. They do. I have notes on it here. I'm so
glad we kinda segued here because I thought that this was amazing. Okay. I'm on
page 40. Yes. I'm on page 40 and 41 of my book, which is a
hardback. It's it's an older version. But essentially,
let's see here. Where'd it go? Where'd it go? Where'd it go?
But the magazines of today do not know a good story when they see one.
They would rather print trash. They say my article is too long and
discursive. Nothing is too long or or too short if you
have a true or interesting tale or what I call a graphic
writing style come combined with educational aims. I do
not fool around with newspapers. They're always after me for historical write ups, but
when the talk gets around the money, paper editors are most or,
the for historical sorry. The paper editors are most of them are
cheapskates. Mhmm. I think because I have a little money, I will be happy to
fill up their Sunday columns just to see my name in print, like Lucille Biggers
Langford and Florence Mabry Whiteside. And, and then it
kind of goes on again as well. It says, where'd it go?
The paper editors are great ones for reaping where they have not sown.
Yes. Absolutely. What an insight. I by the way, I I I've
I've marked that too in my in my copy. I did. I did too.
Another game they have is to send reporters out to talk to you and get
your stories free. Yep. I know the young reporters are not paid well, and I
would not mind helping those boys out with their scoops if they could ever get
anything straight. She thought about the same stuff. Right?
With without and it was funny because when I jumped back in and
started reading this book, I, like,
I don't I wasn't ready for how it's written because it just drops you in,
and you were Oh, yeah. Going. Right? And they do a really good
job of showing how rigid and
how moral and how righteous that she is and how she carries it. Right? From
the jump all the way through. But I was reading the first, you know,
up to that point of page 40 in my book, I was kinda like, oh,
this is gonna be a slog. This is gonna be a slog. Like, this is
not well like, in my head, I was like, this is not very well written.
But when you take into consideration what it's supposed to be Mhmm.
Right, a memoir for 30, 40 years later
from a very direct woman, which is not always easy
for women to be direct now because, I coach I coach women in
in sales roles who struggle with being direct because, you know, sometimes that's
not okay. They get labeled as a business bitch to you know, it's not
my language, but it's common in the in the place of being too direct, too
focused. And, Maddie is a really great
representation of, like, what a direct woman can
be. Right? The other part of this is you just have to make the decision
that no one else's opinions really matter. Right? Tom Maddie is steeped in that.
But until you make that decision, you're you're probably not as
rooted as you think you are in your conversations and your thoughts. Let's talk
about that because this is where we're going now. This is, again, the segue
into beautiful segue into into the next pieces of,
of true grit. So as we move forward in the book,
by the way, when you read true grit, and this is just a
structural thing that you're going to notice, There's no chapter headings in the book.
So when you go in there and read it, there's no chapter headings. And
that goes directly to that whole idea that John was just talking about. It's a
brilliant, brilliant, observation of it just
dropping you in, and you're, like, you're in the car and you're going for the
you're going for the you're going for the gold. Right? And Portis, I think
writers it this way because, he wanted
you to get the sense that you are, you are, you are inside
events as they are occurring. And you're
also experiencing this person's life as it is occurring.
And then you're going to drop right back out again. You're gonna drop in and
you're gonna drop out. And and that's it. There's bookends on Matty
Ross. Right? There's bookends on Rooster Cogburn. There's
bookends on Libby. Right? You know, the Glenn Campbell slash Matt
Damon character. Like, there's bookends on that. Right?
And so, but, but inside those book, what happens inside of those
bookends is critical. And so in the next part of this
book, as we are going from rooster and Maddie
meeting outside of the courthouse, we move into
rooster's life and we get a little bit of a glimpse as to how he's
living. And now this book was written in 1968.
Now there was there there are terms in this book that
if you read them will offend modern ears. Right.
But because we actually
I believe fundamentally in free speech. I always have to say this at least one
time per episode. I fundamentally believe in free speech. I also
fundamentally believe that we have to take the author as he was in his
time, which is why I don't get upset about Ernest Hemingway
using the n word or Mark Twain using the n word. We
could talk about it in the terms of 2024, but neither of
those gentlemen were writing in 2024. I have a
random question about Yeah. Go ahead. You because I've never gotten I've never
gotten asked this before. Yeah. Go ahead. How do you
feel about guys like Quentin Tarantino and how they use
that that word? Because, like, I know he gets a lot of flack for it,
but, you know, I'm also I I'm only asking this because you
said the thing, you know, like like, I'm taking them at their Tom. You
know? So you're talking about Django Unchained. So
I'll let me give you my I'm talking about just in general because, like, you
know, like, that's not the only movie where he's a little bit prolific. It's not
the only movie, but it is the movie that sort of put the stamp on
the on the on the on the rear end of the on the southbound
end of the northbound cow. That was where he was going. Right.
And,
and I read the script. I got a I got a
unreleased script for Django, through some connections that I had
and, previously leaders ago and read it, and they
wanted me to give them feedback. And the feedback that I gave them
was, I don't think you could make this movie.
I don't think this movie can be made. The cultural sensitivity
that is current, the, and this was way back. This
is like probably 2,004, maybe 2,005.
So it was early. It was early before this movie got out. Right.
Yeah. And I used to have those deep connections. I don't have them any anymore
because I've moved on and done other things in my life. But I was like,
I don't I don't think you can do this. I don't think this movie can
be filmed. I think he's leaning into something
here that doesn't necessarily need to be leaned into
because this was way before this was in the
this he was writing this script during a time when the backwash
of the 19 nineties film culture was still fairly strong.
And so you could be a little bit transgressive,
and no one would kinda jump on your stuff.
And then he released it. I can't remember when Django came out. I could find
out, but he releases it and he doesn't get nearly
as much flack for it as I thought he would. And I
thought, well, clearly, I was wrong about that.
And the reason I think I was wrong, it's taken me many years to kind
of understand, but the reason I think I was wrong is B
is multivariate. But I think the core of it is
that
What we do now,
we are not thinking far enough ahead
in the future of the ramifications or the consequences. Oh, yeah. So it's
so it's easy to look at the past,
And this is why I'm never a fan of statues being torn
down or bases being renamed. I will never support
that. This is why, because when
you rename the base or tear down the statue,
what you're saying is we are better morally than those
people then, except the problem is
Django Unchained or pulp
fiction or name your movie
here may be censored in the
future by a group of people with moral claims that
don't match what's here currently.
So let's step a little bit lightly on the moral claims.
Let's try Tom contextualize utilize what actually happened in the
past. Let's raise people to understand that historical
context and appreciate it. And then here's the other thing.
If you want to put a statue next to the one that
talks about what's going on with that statue, do that.
Spend a little public dollars doing that. You wanna rename the base?
Actually, here's a better idea. Put the one name of the base on the
top and then put another name of the base on the Tom.
Do that because here's the thing, just erasing the
history. Doesn't eliminate it. And it actually doesn't eliminate the hurt that
may have been caused by that history. And by the way, the people who may
be hurt by that history, not all of them, but many of
them are no longer in this mortal coil. Agreed.
Meanwhile, the people who are dealing with
Jamie Jamie Foxx dropping the n word every 5 seconds are alive
right now. Yeah. And that's eroding us right now.
I I I so I so I I think it's multivariate, but I think that's
that that for me, that's the core reason right there. It's this high sense
of moral superiority while we've got this other thing going on over
here that we're just like, oh, that's just entertainment. So it's
like virtue signaling in your opinion?
Yes. And virtue signaling to what end?
Well, I think, like, I like the things that by the way.
Maybe I'm wrong on that. Maybe that's bad analysis. I've been willing to listen to
different analysis on that. But for me, I get
I like I said, I read the original story, and I thought this can't happen.
We're we're we can't do this. And, apparently, I was wrong.
That's interesting. I, like, I wasn't thinking about, like, statues and and
bases and stuff like that. I mean, personally, I
and maybe this is weird, but, like, the the line I've been drawing in my
head because, like, I'm not really heard so much about, like, renaming bases, but, like,
I see a lot about the statues coming down and stuff like that. Mhmm. And
maybe this is head trash. Maybe I'm making this, like, a convenient easy way
to hide, but, like, I think a a statue is
reverence. There's an argument to be
made for that. Yeah. It's it's leadership almost. You know? Like like, holding
this person up as, you know, the example, you
know, versus a base with a name, you know, like, some of
the some of the and and maybe this is me just trying to make it
convenient, so please call me if that's true. But, like, you know, a base that
has a name that just might be leading back to someone who's who's
had some, you know, less than stellar experiences with people of the
world is different than, like, a statue saying, like, hey. This
guy this guy is worth public
public homage. Well, okay. Let's talk about
statues for just a second. So
university no. It wasn't university. It was Penn State. Penn State
University. Joe Paterno. Okay? No. Almost no one
remembers this now. But at the time when Joe
Paterno's, was being Joe Paterno's legacy was
being tainted by the scandal of, child abuse by one of
his coaches. I can't remember. Stuff. Right? Jerry's yeah. Yeah. Jerry
Sandusky stuff. Exactly. Mhmm. At the time, I
was coaching rugby at a college that I will not name
here. And, the the I was assistant coach
on staff and the the coach, she made the
point, female coach, she made the point and it says stuck with me for years.
She said, this is why you don't put up statues of people while they're alive.
And she just walked away. Oh, dip. And I was like,
that's an excellent point
because when someone's dead, what you're
doing by putting up a statue to your point is worship and reverence.
Absolutely. For sure. There's a very strong argument to be made about idol worship around
that, which I would object to that just be if it if we were if
we were object if we were tearing down the statues because they're idol worship, not
a problem with that. I'd be I'd be all on board with that. I'd be
like, yeah. Absolutely. That's that's correct. That's the correct alignment of where we're thinking about
the reality. But when we
are putting up statues of people who are alive currently,
We don't know the whole story. The first report is often the
wrong report. Absolutely. For sure.
And so we don't need a first report. We need a second or third or
fourth report. Now the statues that we're talking about tearing down, like Robert e
Lee, we've gotten all the reports on Robert e Lee.
Agreed. We're never gonna be able to go get Robert e Lee's
ghost and make him be 2024. Like, it's never
gonna happen or 2025 or 2026 or 2027 or whatever you're listening to this
podcast. Mhmm. It's it's never gonna happen. And so what
exactly are we trying to do by tearing down the
statue of Robert E. Lee? Are we trying to tear down that object of
leadership, or are we trying to do something else?
And I just I want us to be honest in our
sales process of what you're selling
because I'll buy it if you're honest. Yeah. But if you're
not, we're gonna know. We're gonna know. And we may not know where the dishonesty
is. We may not know where to spot that, but Absolutely. We we've
got a sense. We we've been selling to each other ever since well, either
Adam and Eve were the cavemen depending upon what your perspective is, but we've been
selling to each other since the beginning. 1000%. Right?
We're really good salespeople, and we could spot a scam. We may not know where
it is, but we could spot a scam. And, you know, I think
about this a lot. Right? Because both and I both you and I live in
Texas. Right? Not not super far apart from each other. Right? Like like,
if we decided to hang out as humans
nothing crazy. But, like, reading this book
really brought to light this thing that I think about.
Imagine not having access to global news. Right? Like,
I try to put some pretty big walls between myself and the news cycles and
stuff like that because it just winds me up, and then I can't do anything
about it. I'm trying to be a stoic person. Right? Yeah. It just
doesn't serve me. But imagine, you know, only being
able to read the Granbury Gazette, the
Fort Worth Tom telegram. Right. Right? You're not.
The the info you're the the information you're actually getting news
on is a microscopic pen
in relation to the actual events that are going on around the world. But that's
what I like so much about these two things is or or those two points
is they're talking about how
tightly the narratives are confined. You know?
And not you know,
the the thing we're talking about it now is when you wanna be real with
people, you just don't get, like, the mileage and the push. But, like, back then,
if you wanted to be real with people and didn't fit their agenda, you just
didn't get anything. You didn't get anything. Writers. Well and people were
comfortable pushing back on you. And and this is again reflected
in in sort of how we how we look at the book.
So, you know, colonel Stonehill.
Right? You know, Matty Ross tells him, you know, you're not looking at things in
the right light. And he goes, I'm looking at it in the light of god's
eternal truth. Who says that out loud?
Well, you you know what? I can tell you exactly who says those kinds of
things. Right? Writers the people who say those kinds of things are the people who
go all over salespeople because they're because they're doing a job. I
can't believe you would ever think that I
need your help. Can you? Right? And they get all high and
mighty. Like, it's salespeople have to deal with trying to be
like Maddie Ross without actually being like Maddie Ross the
majority of the Tom. Because sales leaders and lots of leadership, especially
people who think they understand how sales works but haven't ever actually stood in the
stream, love to task everyone else to go be die hards that they're not
willing to do themselves, which is eternally frustrating as a sales coach and
trainer because they're not even capable of
showing up and doing these conversations to the level of quality that they're
expecting of everyone else to do so. And then it's convenient because they get to
say, well, I'm not I'm not I'm not really a salesperson. You know? It's
like, book. But you're gonna go put massive goals on other people
around things that they cannot control because you think you can read the
math, but you just told me that you don't know how to do this job.
Like, all day long, man. It's it's every conversation I have. It's very
frustrating. And I have to tell most of those people, no, because
my my only real big role is I won't work with tyrants. Right? And if
you're gonna tell someone else how to how like, what to do on the stream
that you've never stood in, you are a tyrant. I'm sorry. You need to take
some calls. You need to take some conversations. You need to realize what it's like
to move a meeting and have that potentially, like, ruin your
month before you start telling other people, just don't take no for
an answer because that's not actually how the real world works. So Right.
I love this negotiation piece of Maddie and the, and the Colonel
because she's given it to him. Right? Oh gosh. She's yeah. She is delivering
it. She has a plan from the jump. She like, and I think that the,
I think that the first movie does a better job of showing just how
strategic and thoughtful and intentional she made. She went into that
conversation with a plan. Right. And I I have to talk about this with people
all the time. If you don't have a plan in a conversation, you are someone
else's plan. Correct. So she goes into there with a plan.
She's pushing and pushing and pushing, and she knows the levers that she can do.
Like, you know, I have a lawyer. We have a refund. You know? It's it's,
you know, you know what what is gonna play and what's going to advance and
what's gonna get it shut down. But I'll that exchange in the book
and then in both of the movies, I think is very well done
because our culture is not built around haggling. Right? And we're moving
rapidly in a direction to where people are doing everything they can to
avoid salespeople. Now salespeople have kinda done this to themselves. Right? Like, I'm
not I'm not saying that, but, you know, the people who were just
doing the job versus the people who were who were handing out all these touches
and outreach and goals and everything else like this, you know, we gotta give the
people who are just doing the work a little bit of little bit of it
literature benefit of the doubt that they're not making all the decisions because they probably
wouldn't be doing terrible, terrible outreach the way that they
are currently. Well and here's another character who's who's living with
who who needs the benefit of the doubt. And you what you what you
said to me about, you know, the leaders who don't
have no clue what it is to sit in a essays
and, you know, potentially have that fall off the cliff.
Right? We've gotta talk
about Libby. Oh my god. We gotta talk about We gotta talk about
this guy. Okay. So first of all, what, a piece of trivia that I learned
which blew my mind was that Glyn Campbell was not supposed to be the actor.
It was supposed to be Elvis. Did you know
that? I did not know that it was supposed to be Elvis. Yeah. It was
supposed to be Elvis. But it but he couldn't do it. So so that's where
the Glenn Campbell thing kinda kinda came along. And then
Wow. Yeah. Like That would have been a totally different movie. Totally
different movie. 1 I mean, astronomically different. I don't think
I don't think he could have done the job that Labief does
in the first, movie well. Now I think Matt Damon does a
better job than Glenn Campbell, but he's a better actor with with better skill.
And and then also the movie being paced so differently is is very Yeah. The
pacing is different. I struggled a little bit
with Matt Damon in his role in in in with him as
Libby only because I thought
and this is a John McWhorter linguistic, you know, sort
of critique. You've got 19th century words falling out
of a 21st century guy's mouth. Yeah. He's like Brad Pitt in
Troy. He doesn't do a good job of, like, affecting, you know,
an accent. Tom makes sense. Right. You're Brad, you're I'm
glad you brought that analogy because, you know
and I know Brad Pitt's, like, 60 now, so he's not he's he's he's
now I mean, he's now grown man. He's long since a grown man. But,
I always thought of him as an actor as just being a sort of a
glorified pool boy, basically. Oh
yeah. Oh, yeah. Whereas Matt Damon,
Matt Damon has worked to
reinvent himself multiple times over in multiple
different films. Right? Okay. So and I can give him
credit for that, and I appreciate the
fact that he's done that while also seemingly,
you know, avoiding scandal, avoiding political nonsense that sort of ruins
actors' careers these days. I don't think the guy tweets. I
appreciate that. I suspect who he voted for, but I'm
not it's not confirmed. Thank god for that. I can go watch a movie with
him, and it's fine. You know? I don't have to be seen there the whole
time thinking, you know, like, I don't I don't under I don't have any of
that I don't have any of that any of that, what do you call it,
mileage with with Matt Damon. Do you carry that
a lot in movies and stuff? Do I carry that? No.
Well I I I tend I I try. Right.
Right. We're way off topic here, but I try to give topic. We're in the
weeds. I try to give people credit for the art,
And then I try to give them a wide berth. Now, like some
people go too far. You know? Like like, I still have Kanye
albums, but I'm not listening to his streaming stuff. You know? Like but I'm not
gonna go burn the albums because the musics are Right. Amazing.
Right? Like, sorry. Not not gonna even kind of equivocate on
that. But then it's like, you know,
I know people who really high who who really hate Kevin Hart because of some
of the stuff that he's kinda said about, you know, the the gay and trans
community and stuff like that. And, you know,
I'd I'd rather someone be real than than get a fake apology on social
media because, because your publicist or your team told you that you should go
apologize out of fear of being canceled. Like, well, I think
ideally we don't make stupid, stupid statements anyway over the megaphone of social
media, but, you know, he is meant to be a polarizing figure because he
is a comedian. Right? Right. I really
thank you for the for the essays on this because I was not really able
to kinda think about this book as a comedy until
I've heard those 2 things. But it very much is, like,
it's absurd, kind of absurd to think about. Yeah. Well,
like so talk about absurdity. Libby, you know,
runs into Maddie Ross. Not in In the middle of
nowhere. In the middle of nowhere. And knows who she is and knows her
mom and, like, everything is okay. And, like, in the movie, she just wakes up
and she the guy is in her room. Right. Creepy as
hell. Book, creeper. Like,
that's okay. Now I'm off put just from the jump on that.
1000%. Yeah. And and by the way, I think both Kim Darby and
Hailey how how Hailey Steinfeld, I think
they both captured that, but I think that's just that's just the thing that women
have about men who show up creepily. Like, I don't think that's anything to them
as as far as their their acting chops go. I think that's just how
women respond. Yeah. And then to deal with it as a woman, I would say.
I would say. Exactly. And then Labeouf doubles down with
Rooster Cogburn. And he doubles down with rooster Cogburn, which
is amazing in this part of the book. He doubles down with rooster
Cogburn on number 1 being a Texas Ranger, which amused the heck
out of me. But then number 2, on being
a Texas ranger. He had nothing else. Nothing. Nothing else underneath his
character to kind of lean him. And,
I think Damon gives more depth to that character, particularly
at the end where he shakes, he shakes Maddie Ross's hand and then sort of
rides off. That doesn't happen in in the original film.
Glenn Campbell kind of kinda plays it a little more.
I won't say goofy, but he does play it as a
grown man who's dealing with a little kid. Mhmm. And he's like, why am I
dealing with this little kid? I'm a Texas ranger for God's sakes.
And that ties into what you were saying about
leadership understanding how sales works. I don't have to understand
how sales works. I'm the leader. That's Libby.
That's that's him. And so, you know, he his character gets pushed
along. He gets pushed along. And, you know, eventually,
rooster, decides that, that, you
know, we've had about enough of this. Right? And I'm not gonna not
gonna deal with you. And, of course, he draws down on him. Mhmm. And
Labeouf backs off. And now there's this constant tension between these
two men, and it is I mean, you can read into a
patriarchal tension, which is typically how most people would read it, I
think, these days. But at a deeper level, this is a
tension of competency. And that's what you get in the true grit in the
in the Ethan Cohen movie, the newer one. Yep. You don't get so much
of that tension in the original, but it is definitely there.
And I think they don't get it there because the time in which that
movie was made, 66, 67, 68, I think it was shot in 66 and
67, and then it was, of course, released in 68. But,
but I think that that tension didn't exist because
and here's what's different about our time than it is than it was
then. If you were
a 20 year old guy, you were a grown
man. Yeah. That's the that's the most
fascinating part of this, right, is realizing just how different
we are. She's 14
going off and doing this thing. And while, like, it's part of the shock of
reading the book is just realizing my daughter's 12. Right. Like, man,
I'm not hey hey, dad. I'm gonna go no. You're not. Well,
I'm going I'm going with you. Let's go, you know, kinda situation and stuff
like that. You know? So part of it was just this kinda shock and, like,
it's funny to bring this up because, like, as I'm reading it,
I'm having this moment of, like, oh, is my dissonance here
just because her age or how much of it is
because it's a woman or a female, right, you know, in the book?
Because you read, like, you know, Tom Sawyer, Huckleberry Finn, you know, these
other kind of heroic younger kid going off and doing
adult things on their own and stuff like that. And I've I've not read those
books in a very long Tom, and maybe maybe it would it would ring the
same alarm bells as a parent and an adult that reading this did. But, you
know, I'm also trying to test to, like, figure out, like, is it weird
just because it's a little girl and I'm not used to that? Or is it
weird because, like, she's taking off and crossing state lines and going into, like,
territories that, like, we don't have any jurisdiction in.
And I'm gonna go into the Choctaw Nation. Good luck. And
literature can't like, is so righteous and so driven, can't
even understand where the perilous nature of this
thing is. Right? Yeah. And then the you know, he's challenging
her. Hey. There's not gonna be food and inns and beds and stuff like that.
And she's like, well, we went on a hunt last summer. It was fine. And
it's just like, oh, man. I I can remember being a very
young salesperson trying to sell investments to people, you know, and I'm
talking about, well, you know, you can you can do this over here. It's gonna
be fine. And, you know, I'm talking to people that were alive during the depression
who have books older than me because they were alive during the depression, so they
don't throw anything out. So, of course, I don't resonate.
Of course, it's BS. Of course, it's like talking to their, you know,
nephews, grandson kind of situation. Right? It was
Yes. It was it was, you know, I didn't I
didn't realize whenever I was doing that job. You know, I was 30 years old.
I looked all of 22. I didn't have the hair or the beard yet. And
also, like, I wasn't really settled as a professional. You know?
I was just out there trying to make some money, you know, and keep things
moving and stuff like that. So, you know,
if you there's a way to communicate with other
people who are on the level that lets them know that you're on the level.
And I talked about this in my in my coaching and teaching world
because, like, if you're doing outreach to people and you're trying to get a meeting,
if you can't communicate that you're on the level, the default
assumption is that you're not even worth being, like like, talked to.
Well and and and Rooster, let's talk a little bit about him because he's the
old grizzled veteran. Right? He's that old grizzled
veteran sales guy who shows up with the rumble suit. He's
got a 2 day old, you know, whatever beard. He
smells vaguely of the last beer he drank. You've run across this
guy. But he walks into the room and he closes.
And then he walks out, and he says, you have a good day. And he
goes right back to his hotel bar and posts up there, like in
Glengarry Glen Ross, greatest sales film ever May, has another
drink with Jack Lemmon, complains about how hard how hard sales is.
Right? Yeah. And you're sitting there, and you're going I don't
like, Matt Damon in Ocean's, I think it was Ocean's 12,
when he walked in and he insulted the, I always think about the scene where
he walks in and he insults the, the the the whatever
whoever it is that Brad Pitt and George Clooney are trying to scam and about
their daughter and something, and he walks out. And Brad Pitt and George Clooney are
messing with him, and they go, you just insulted his daughter. Yeah. Blah blah blah
blah. You said this. Yeah. You said that. And and this course, the 2 grizzled
veterans screwing with a rookie. And Matt Damon goes, no idea what
just happened there. Yes. That is that is
every person after a cold calling session. You're right. And
Rooster knows what happened there. He knows exactly what he knows
let's see. Rooster knows exactly what's gonna happen with Choctaw Nation.
He knows exactly how hard it is to go get Tom Chaney or Chelmsford,
by the way, played in the, in the Ethan Cohen film by Josh Brolin,
in a in a in a great not a great role. I don't think they
gave him enough to work with or not Josh Brolin. Yeah. It was just Brolin.
Yeah. Yeah. It was Didn't give him enough to work with. Yep. Didn't give him
nearly enough to work with. Right? Like nearly enough. That dude is an amazing
actor. Right? And I had forgotten who played him in the newer one. Right? Because
in the old movie, you know, not a big part. You know?
Yeah. I you coulda you coulda walked an extra on and given him a SAG
card, you know, in for that performance. But, you know, Brolin, I
was expecting a lot, and it just kinda seemed like he was, you
know, trying way too hard to play a half wit because there wasn't
really enough to really do anything else. Tom, man,
you know, the other part is is, like, as a
culture Mhmm. We do spend a lot more time
on a on a hold on. Let me say this the right way. On a
path of education.
Might not be correct, might not be valid, but, you know, we we're
connected a lot more to sources of knowledge, good, bad, or
or otherwise than people were back then. Right? So whenever Right. It's so
funny, in the book when he's lamenting and talking about how
nothing goes his way. Writers. The, the auctioneer does
the same thing. It's so funny because Maddie in the book, you know, she keeps
running into these people who were just victims of uncontrollable situations.
Yes. And she's such a force of nature. It creates this real
really interesting contrast. Right? Now Oh,
by the way, the original Yeah. Sorry. The original pardon me. The
original, Tom Chaney. I I forgot about it, and then I had to look on
the back. Robert Duvall. Or no. Robert Duvall with Book
Ned Pepper. Tom Chaney was played by
I think it was Strother Martin, if I remember correctly. I think that was the
guy who that was the guy who played it. Is. Dennis Hopper's in that movie
as well. Yes. Right. Yes. When they when
they're when they're they're, shooting the 2 guys over the soft key and all yeah.
Oh, yeah. Uh-huh. I'd forgotten I'd forgotten that he was in that movie, and
then I was watching the credits. And, I was like, Dennis Hopper? That's crazy. Well
and Libby Ned Pepper was such well, anyway no. Sorry. You're so you're talking about
Josh Brolin talking about pursuing education. Mhmm.
I think that and and and to the larger
point, you know, Cogburn knows all these things. Right? He he knows all of
the stuff, and he knows it so well
that he can sleep in a bed, and both Wayne and Bridges got
this. He can sleep in a bed that's broken down,
shoot a rat, live with a Chinese immigrant, and
get up and go do his stuff anyway. Now there's this section in the
book which is kind of touched
on in the original film, and then it's totally completely abandoned in
the Ethan Cohen version
If you put it in. And he's, like,
making it up on the spot. We'll change it to this person because, yeah, I
think I shot that guy once, you know, kind of thing. And and, like,
playing fast and loose with your expense reports, you know, is such like a it's
such a sales thing. Right? Like, you know, like, like, we can
expense this thing and then it gets, like, snapped out the half cord, and then
you're you're trying to justify why you spent the money. Like, man, I've
I've I've been on both sides of that, honestly. Well, like, he's out he's
out in the middle of nowhere. No one from back east
knows. And this is the other thing. I'm I'm fascinated with the old west pipe
for a number of different reasons, but the one of the biggest ones is
and and you and I both you mentioned both you and I both live in
Texas. There are Texas is so big
that there are parts of Texas that
I don't even know where the heck they are.
Yeah. And I live here, Much less
living on the East Coast, it's another universe out
here. And that's the brilliance of and I
always talk about well, not always, but one of the things I'll talk about sometimes
around this area is manifest destiny. Manifest destiny gets crapped on a lot
these essays, as an excuse for colonialism, racism,
sexism, bigotry, patriarchy, dah, dah, dah, dah, dah, dah, dah.
Okay. But
but manifest destiny was also
rooster cogber making it up as he was going along and
ensuring that a variation of
civilization was allowed to continue
so that people like the, the guy in little house
on the prairie, who's just trying to live, can actually live
there, can actually live there and actually like
make a living. Right? Now were there Indians there? Should we
not have taken over their land? For sure. Should we have done a better deal?
For sure. I'll caveat all of that if you will
caveat to me that no one back east knew what the hell was going
on. Oh, man. Like, I have a
clue. I'm from Texas. The expense sheets and pay rooster.
Yeah. Like, I've lived here my entire life, and until I joined the military and
went to Georgia, realizing
just how different it is Yeah. For people on the
coasts. Right? Yeah. We had a we had a particularly heated
moment to where, a white guy
who's from Seattle, Washington. Right? Very,
very not the south. Yeah. Says
to an African American fellow that he looks a little bit
like a monkey. And he has no idea
about the weight of that term because
he was he was just giving the guy crap. You know? He wasn't making
a a bigger judgment call. But, man, I've never I've
never seen sides chosen so quickly, right, amongst the group of guys that
are all supposed to be on the same side. You know? And it's you know,
he has no knowledge about that. But
to your point, there's there's cities in in in the state that we both lived
in that if you walk into the biggest hub of
commerce Mhmm. In that city, you would
probably be looked at just like you would have a 100
years ago if you'd walked into that situation in the same thing. Like,
it's still there. You know? And some people
are choosing to create it for themselves, which is a whole other conversation. But
Yeah. Yeah. Well, and I and and, yeah, that's a whole other that's that's
that's a little bit that's a little bit beyond where we need to That's a
whole other podcast, Rob. That's a whole other episode.
But I think that Labeef represents
that civilization too. He represents that civilizing force,
but it's a civilizing force. It's cocksure and arrogant. Mhmm. Whereas
Rupert Cogburn is the civilizing force that knows
kind of like John Wayne in in the man who shot Libby Valance, another
great film where, you know,
Libby Stewart is gonna bring the law book,
and none of that matters in the
particular situation that you We used to love that. I think I think I think
that I think that is the nineties eighties kind of,
like, time period. Right? You know? And so that's why people love
Clint Eastwood and John. You know? In in these kind of movies to where it's
about the street smart guy telling the book smart people that they don't really know
what it's like and stuff like this. But,
man, you know, we it's so easy to just look at that,
you know, plot device Mhmm. And be
like, oh, yeah. Right?
Some people are bad. You know? Yeah. Right. Yeah.
Some people need a shorter leash. Right? They don't need
the the, you know, the loudspeaker Sorrells media. They don't
need all of that stuff. Right. And, I like what you said
that, he doesn't tweet. I appreciate that. You know, he doesn't,
he doesn't do any of these things. I think I think that's in
care about any of that. Sorrells didn't care about any of that. He cared about,
he just wanted to writers. He just wanted to share his stories. It like the
way that I talk about it now with people is like, he was fine making
art. Yeah. And I I've shifted a lot on
this because in the beginning I was very much kinda, why doesn't my stuff
get more of a push and all this other stuff? And why why is everyone
holding me down and all this other stuff? Right? Part of it, I was choosing
to because of how I wanna talk about the work. Right? Right.
But, man, I I think that part of it
is
it's tied to, like, so much of the other stuff. Right? Mhmm. How are you
doing that work? And is it unpopular because it's unpopular, or is it
unpopular because you're wrong? You know? Right. One of the things that I talk about
with people is, like, okay. If no one likes the girl you're dating,
nobody. She's probably not
great. Right? And you should probably but you can't tell your friend that.
No. When you're dating. Right? No. Yeah. But, like, afterward, I told you, bro.
Told you. Told you. Everyone tried to tell everybody. Everyone Everybody knew.
You're the only one who didn't get it. Yeah. You know? Right. Right. So there
is that thing of, like, are you doing are you are you are you unpopular
because you take unpopular stances? Are you unpopular because you're actually, like,
not on the level? Well and and and Maddie,
to turn back to her for just a second, you know, she's narrating this book
and looking back as a middle aged woman. Right. And so you would
think that that moralism would be softened over the
course of time, because that's what we say. People get older, their, their
perspectives become more nuanced. They get to be a little bit more,
whatever, soften the edges round off. Writers.
But not no. No. No. Not Maddie Ross. Like The
She she locked in, and and she was
uncompromising. And the thing that we, we sort of skated around it, it skated around
it, and now we need to actually hit it. The thing that made her uncompromising
was her religion. It was her Christian Christian religion.
And that's the other thing that makes this book an anachronism. And I, I
worry that over the court, not worry. I wonder if
in 50 years, anybody will remember Charles Fortis. They'll
remember the movie, probably. For sure. But in the book,
I doubt it. I don't think anybody's gonna read it in 50 years if because
we now live in a for good, better, or or or or or for
good or bad, we now live in a post Christian
America. We do. We live in a world where the the thin
veneer of cultural Christianity that used to bind
people together, even people who didn't believe,
they would at least nod to cultural Christianity. They would at least say, yeah, the
10 commandments, our laws are based on that. That's cool. We're
way the heck away from that now.
And, I think the further and further we
get away from that, the more and more we're gonna struggle with meaning. We talked
a lot about meaning this podcast last year a lot,
because I firmly believe that without the Christian underpinnings,
because I'm I'm a partisan for Christianity, I say this at least once an episode.
That's my thing. You know, that underpinning
for me is the
is the cornerstone in Western civilization. It's the thing that if
you if you pull that sucker out, the whole thing the whole thing falls
down, because what are you going to
appeal to? Like, maybe it is okay for
me to eat my neighbor if my morality and their morale, if morality is just
relative, then I can just eat my neighbor. Right? Like, there's not a problem. There's
no issue there. Man, I have said I have a very polarizing
opinion to you on this because I am not a spiritual person at all. I
am not religious. Right? I spent my time doing Southern
Baptists and then realized that I got tired of, like, constantly
being sold. Right? Sure. That's what it felt like. You know, lots of lots of
pressure, and don't you want it, you know, blah blah blah. Can't why can't
you just believe? Why can't you just sign up for Jesus today? Yeah,
absolutely. Right. I, I, I know a couple of really
cool people that I knew during this Tom. And because of
these interactions with them, my perception of them is colored because
while I'm sure they're great people in and of themselves, it just felt like a
sales rush the entire time. And I don't
I I hate the conversation of, like, well, if you're not religious,
you don't really have any morals. Right? Because a lot of people go there and
it's, like, way too polarizing of a situation. Because I will say
you have I will say you don't have any morals. I would say if you're
not religious, where is your moral bed bedrock then?
That's a good point. Right? And and Where's the lie? So important distinction. Right? Like,
I'm not trying to say that you were saying this, but people have asked me
this question before. Well, John, if you're not religious, where do your morals come from?
You know, the laws book know, the laws have a big part of
it, And now that I'm now that I'm older and I've done the kung fu
path, right, Tom to instructorship, and now, like, I try to follow stoicism
and, you know, like, I've got I have a a guide and a
compass. Now what's hilarious is, like, this last week, I was talking to someone about
this thing on Facebook. Mhmm. And, he kind of got a little high and
mighty around the idea that like, Hey, if it's not attached to God, you're just
wasting your time. And it's like, cool. We can't have conversations anymore. At least
not about this. You know? He works in the same space. Right? So we can
refer back and forth, but, you know, after being told that Tom
that my work on my own philosophies doesn't matter because it's not attached
to, you know, an an idol that he sees absolutism
in, you know, like, why would I go back to that conversation with that
person ever Sure. Again in the future? Right? Because I'm not
I I don't expect anyone to shift in their thinking to my way, but I
do expect to be treated as an adult who has some thought and some intention
in how I go about making my decisions. So whenever people just
kinda backlash with, like, well, if you just read the Bible or if you just
went to church, you wouldn't have Tom it's like, no, I would still be doing
this work even if I was thinking in that way because the work
itself is important. Now, the place that I've come to
because there for a while, I was fairly I was fairly vocal
about my lack of faith, if you will. And now the place that I've gotten
to is you look at the positives
in all of these areas, whether it's stoicism or Christianity or Buddhism
or anything else like this, and you look at the negatives, and it's alarming
how much they line up of being consistent. Mhmm. Now the trappings and
the labels and some of the practices are going to be very, very different, but
the structure of these things is more aligned than it's not.
You know? And, I think I think if I had
not read all the philosophy stuff and not been in a in
a role that is so focused around performance and your mindset and your
behaviors and your attitudes around it, I think I'd be a lot more
probably stuck. But I've had I've had sales managers and
sales leaders tell me, hey. We've we've already hit our goal on that one.
Go tell them that we're out so that way they'll buy this one. I've had
I've had people try to get me to go lie on their behalf so that
way I can hit a number for them. And I and I don't do
that. Right? And then it's like, well, John, you know, you should do what I
tell you to know, man. Sorry. I'm not gonna compromise myself for your goals.
And And that's the thing you see with Maddie Ross. Yeah. That's the
thing I was getting to is her comp her uncompromisingness
comes from her religious bedrock. Yeah. Your uncompromisingness
comes from your exploration of philosophies
and worldviews and, you know, sort of cobbling that
together. And
we talked about this a little bit in the episode that we just did on
Malcolm X because Malcolm X, his
entire worldview came from Islam. Yep.
And you know, it was interesting. We, we pointed out on that episode that,
you know, he was converted to Islam in prison in the 1950s
when he was serving an 8 to 10 year bid came out,
started talking, hooked up with Elijah. Mohammed, struck up with the nation
of Islam, you know, changed his name to Malcolm X from Malcolm
Literature. And then during the course of time between, you know,
the time he got out of prison and his assassination in, in the in
the mid 19 sixties, he went he actually traveled to
Mecca and and went on the went on,
went on the pilgrimage. Writers? Came back and was
changed because he saw the differences between what they were doing
in Arabia, Saudi Arabia, with their version of Islam
and what we were doing here or what, you know, the black nationalists were doing
here with the nation of Islam version of Islam. And he saw the
the cracks in the, in the facade. In the veneer. Yeah. In the veneer. Right?
Absolutely. And
the point that we made on the podcast, and this is where I thought you
were going to struggle with the book the most, and this is where I think
most folks will struggle with the book, particularly in, again, a post Christian,
postmodern era. I genuinely think we're there. I think we've been
there for a minimum 10 years, probably max 15,
for a whole variety of social reasons that are way too deep to get into
right now. Do you quantify like, how okay. You say that you say that
statement. Right? Yeah. And then the the person that I am. Yeah.
What illustrates that? Like Oh, gosh. If we if we went and we
tried to do a quantified analysis, would that mean that that
more than half of our nation is not I will give you
I I will actually give you a statistic here. Please. 8083,
folks were surveyed. I think it was about 2 or 3 years ago.
Only 17% of the sample survey. And I can't remember, I can't remember how big
the sample survey was, but only 17% of the survey attended church
more than more than once a month.
So 83% of that sample attends church once a month or
0 and still calls themselves Christian. I don't
think you can you can effectively engage in that
space
without some more buttressing
of the belief system. Now now on the on the backside of that
now what wait. On the backside of that too, I'll also say this is the
other data point on the backside of that. We saw this with post COVID.
The numbers of churches that are declining in membership, and we don't
see it in Texas. So you have to go Of course. Writers. You have
to go outside of Texas to see this. Yeah. The
megachurch. Come down to Texas, guys. Right. Come down to Texas, guys. But if you
go on the I mean, I lived in the East Coast for I lived in
the East Coast Tom the northeast for 25 years. Mhmm. The number
of megachurches there, that concept doesn't exist.
So when you say the line that you said Yeah. The the
bigger concern is you have people or in and if and if I'm way
off base, please correct me. Sure. The the major concern is you have people going
around saying that they're making decisions based upon Christianity,
but they're not steeped enough actually in the knowledge, the
values, the morals to really to really know whether or
not their actions would line up with that, but they're kinda hiding. For
sure. So so is that the concern? That's the
concern. Okay. So it's not that so it's not that you think that
people, like, need to go to church. No. I'm not saying that. If you're gonna
go out and be like, hey, I'm making decisions from a biblical stance, you need
to be in church. Yeah. I I would think that that would be helpful. Yeah.
Probably. I I I mean, here's the thing. You know, if I think
that would be helpful, actually. Yeah. Like, you know, we're both martial artists,
and we both have, like, shifted our lanes. Right? And while I while I still
do my forms and everything else like this, it would be absurd for both of
us to sit here and be like, you know what? I'm just as good at
my old art as I am and, like, the stuff I'm working on now because
you're not putting on the practice, you're not putting on the work, and rest
accumulates on on anything. You're not showing up at the dojo. I'm not
showing up at the studio to do my old art. Yep.
Like And if you if you're not running forums and figuring it out and building
a community for yourself, those skills are decaying. Just like, you
know, if if if I stopped taking my own calls and setting my own meetings
and everything, eventually, I would become one of these people that I don't like.
Writers? Exactly. Which is why I will always have a lane of either
setting my own meetings so I'm attached to that book, and I know how much
it sucks whenever it doesn't go your way. Or, you know,
eventually, I will be hopefully selling at a place to where
my stuff has got a little bit of growth to it. You know? Like, not
like a household name, but, you know, one of the bigger names. But at that
point, what I would like to do is, you know, sell under,
like a, like a pen name. Right? So that way I can still come on,
but not there's this one video that just drives me crazy
where it's a Grant Cardone video. Right? And he walks in and someone's on a
call, and Grant Cardone just he he he's like he's like, hey. You wanna call?
He just grabs it. He's like, yeah. This is Grant. And then closes the deal.
And everyone's like, yeah. It's his name on the
entire sign. If he can't close that deal, that would be the
problem. Right? Like like, all of this stuff around
authority and content and everything else like this, like, leads to a place to where
you're you're you're you're making it easier to be heard. You know? But by that
same token, Grant is Grant had that guy and
everyone else who's selling on their authority and their name and their prestige absolutely
is as disconnected from what it actually takes to be a salesperson than in the
day to day as these leaders who were looking at data points all day in
Salesforce and HubSpot and wanting to tell the salesperson, hey. You know what? We'd really
like you to, like, improve your close rate a little bit, but not give him
any information or knowledge on how to do that. You said the word there,
authority. That's the word I've been that's the word I've
been I've been leading into. Maddie Ross takes her
authority from the Bible and from her biblical belief,
grant Cardone takes his authority from grant Cardone.
Although recently I heard he's a Scientologist. I did not know that. That was an
interesting There's a lot of people in the coaching space who are pushing Scientology
with, like, their own labels. Like, it's it's really common than you would think that
it would be. I know a I know a mega coach who it's it's Scientology
rebranded under his own stuff. Interesting.
Yeah. Did not know that. Thank you for that data
point. I'll put that in the back of my head and chew on that
for a little bit. But Grant Cardone is selling off of I'm Grant
Cardone. Okay? That's where he's getting his authority
from. Where are we the the thing for leaders is
from where does your authority come? And Yeah. A guy like
Malcolm x spoke with moral authority in questioning the United
States during the civil rights struggle because he came
from a position of moral authority based on his
religion. Yep. Maddie Ross came from a position of
moral authority based on her religion. And by the way, as a female
character in literature, I rank her as up there with, like, you
know, Wendy and Peter Pan, Alice and Alice in Wonderland, and most particularly
Dorothy in the wizard of Oz. Very rarely do you have a woman. I
mean, think about the wizard of Oz. I love this movie because everything
moves in the wizard of Oz because of something Dorothy
does. That's really interesting.
Same thing in True Grit. The forward motion of the novel
is because of Mattie Ross. You know,
not to be the sales guy in that when you're a sales guy, everything's a
sales opportunity, but, you know, most of them are.
As as I'm reading this book and I'm seeing her run over,
right, certain people. Right? Oh, yeah. And then,
you know, she tries to run over Rooster, and it doesn't work.
Right? They they eventually become kind of collaborative in their
negotiations. And it's so funny because,
I feel like Maddie and most of her conversations can push people around just
like most people can do in a b to c type sale. Right? They're not
aware. They don't do this a lot. It's easy to manipulate them and talk them
into the things and force the value perceptions and stuff like that. And so then
you think like, oh my gosh. I can I can sell b Tom b? And
then you go and you meet Rooster Cogburn, and you try to move him
with your ideas and your agendas, and it just doesn't work. And that's
what, like, selling b Tom b is. These people are savvy. They've been here
before. They they have had more of these conversations than you have,
and you're just going to show up and be like, is it a question of
time or value, and think it's going to get heard well? That's not how this
works. You know? They have more authority than you do
in those situations, and so you can't you know, there's a lot of talk
about framing and forcing authority and taking authority away and everything
else like this, but you fundamentally can't put
authority on someone who has real authority
and isn't concerned. Not only
that. And I've been selling b Tom b my entire training career.
All I do is sell b to b. Mhmm. I would I I mean, I've
done projects where I've sold b to c before, and it's Sure. To me, it's
so easy. My god. It's it's easy to go backward. If they
come to the meeting, you're good. Oh. Right? Whereas in b Tom b,
like like, if you're if if they come to the meeting, great. They got an
opportunity to take a break from the real actual work. It doesn't mean they're invested.
It doesn't mean that they're they're aware of a problem. It doesn't mean that they
see you as someone who help them or anything else like this. They just were
like, well, I don't wanna do cold calls, so let's go to the webinar. And
then you got some poor sales guy over there, like like, telling everyone, I got
one. No. You don't. You don't have anything. You got nothing. You got someone
who's avoiding of the work and they're coming out with you so that way you
can be avoiding of your prospecting. Congratulations. We're all You got 4 more
meetings. That's what you actually, no. It's not 4 more. You got 4 months more
of meetings. Yes. That's what you got. And then a and then a a disappear
into the ninja vanish smoke. Into into the Ninja Vantage spoke. Into the Ninja Vantage
spoke. I had that actually had that happen to me, like, 2 weeks ago. Disappeared
into the Ninja Vantage spoke. I was like, well, okay. I got 2 big noes
last week. Right? And I I think I think that this is an an important
point if you are a leaders, if you're in a leadership shop, you have to
talk about that it still happens to you. Right? You know, because people are
like, well, John, you don't get what it's oh, you want to talk about how
I don't get it? I can show you my DMs where, like, I I booked
on a wrong thing, and a guy wanted to, like, try to sue me because
I booked on his free discovery and not like, hey, chat with us kind of
thing. Like, when you when you're rooted,
and this is the part that I love about the book, and I don't think
anyone else is gonna get this point except for maybe you, when you are
rooted, everyone else moves. Yes. And if
you are not rooted Yes. And this is what Seneca talks about. You're not
gonna find yourself in the crowd. And until you do find yourself, the crowd is
the last place you need to be hanging out at, and once you do find
yourself, you know where you know where you don't want to be? The crowd. The
crowd. Right? Because you're you've ruined it for everyone
else. You're the poker player who's read one book and understands all the math and
play, and everyone else is like, man, can you believe how lucky that guy is?
You're the sales guy who who has done hundreds of thousands of calls and
conversations. And then whenever someone is like, well, we can meet if you're cheaper, and
you realize that's not worth going to. That's actual practice authority
and knowledge and stuff like that as opposed to, you
know, trying to cultivate hope. Right? Right. When you're a revenue person
and you're cultivating hope, you're just setting yourself up to fail and get fired. And
you have to be no nonsense. You have to be, I'm gonna push as hard
as I think that I need to push, and then we'll we'll make
adjustments. And I love how they do how they show that in the
book. Right? I think they do a better job of that in the second movie
than they do the first one, right, of her being thoughtful and strategic and
intentional and stuff like that. Because it's not all hard talk. She's working
towards a goal. She knows how much money she wants from him for this entire
situation, which is allowing her to have that, no.
My lawyer, Jane Noble Daggett, would not be happy with me accepting anything less than
$300. That's right. Yeah. You know? Like, it
it's that having a clear goal, being practiced, and then
also running wild with that authority, whether it's
actually true and validated or whether, you know, the fake
it Tom you and make it stuff of sales and marketing and entrepreneurship, like, kind
of bothers me because, like, people will just lie to try to get a deal
and stuff like that. But on the other side of it, you do kinda have
to, like, drink your own Kool Aid a little bit. Right? If you're putting yourself
out there and hanging a shingle, you're you're supposed to think you're good enough. Right?
You go to a restaurant from a chef Well, and you're supposed
to, you're supposed to be able
to no. Not even that. I'll frame it this way. I tell
young entrepreneurs, the
first sale I just told us to somebody last week, the first sale you have
to do. I don't care if it's B2C, B2B, whatever your business is.
That's almost irrelevancy. The first sale you have to do
is your partner. Your, your, and you've, I've talked about this before on the podcast,
but your wife, your girlfriend, your boyfriend, whatever situation you've got going
on, that's the first husband, whatever. That's the first
sale you've gotta do. If you can't close that,
don't bother with your project. Mhmm. Because the because the
dynamic at your house is gonna be a
constant distraction, and you're
gonna be you you talked about this earlier. You're going to be going to your
business to solve all the games that you have to play or to solve
all the puzzles that you have to play, and you're gonna wind up hiding in
there because, you know
or or even worse, you're gonna be hijacked by that business,
which is even worse. Yep. Now,
yeah, you have a $100,000,000 company, but you
hate it. You hate it. You hate your clients. You hate the team. Like, I
was talking to someone about this because he, he's like, man, I gotta go I
got a great podcast out to you. I was like, great. What's your goal? And
he goes, well, to make the podcast. I was like, great. Start. You don't need
anything else. Start. Yep. And he was like,
you know? And when when you put in poker, this this is called being
putting someone to a decision. Mhmm. Right? And there's an allegory in sales
that you need to put people to decisions. Hey. Mhmm. You don't want this. I'm
leaving. That's putting it to a decision in the form of a takeaway, you know,
kind of situation. And so the guy goes, well, I said, okay. What
happens if you make a 100 episodes and you don't make any money? He goes,
that would be fine. I said, cool. Start. What are you waiting on? You know?
Let's do the Jocko thing. You don't need anything. You need conversations.
Go. That's it. And he goes, well, you
know, as much as I'd be okay doing that, I'd still rather do the show
that makes a bunch of money. And I'm like, cool. Like, you're not really clear
on what's important then. Right? So so anything that,
you know, a shiny object syndrome that could have a little glint to it. It's
gonna pull your focus from the thing because you're not sure that it has it
over here. And that's okay as long as your goals are aligned with the
idea that you're not making art, because art you make for yourself and
the individuals that will appreciate it, you are making a business focused
podcast, which means your decision trees are gonna be fundamentally different.
Back to the book for just a moment. Yeah. Sorry. We get we get super
tangent. Like, we do we do conversation. I like, I've been I've been I've
been making notes. I've been I've been practicing myself of, like, making
sure we talked about some things because I,
like, I there for a while, I was trying
to become my version of Maddie, this person. Right? Whenever I first
met my sales coach and I found out who I was and started doing assessments
and on a path of self awareness, I realized that I do have this
little nurturing aspect to me. Writers? And then I decided, you know what? I'm gonna
murder this person so that way I can be all business, brass tacks type. You
know? And I spent probably 4 or 5 years trying to, like,
kinda destroy that side of myself in the form of
being more businesslike. Mhmm. And now finally, I
can turn and I can face that and appreciate that it does make me different.
It does make me, like, wanna come onto this this conversation
and talk about a book that no one is reading and hasn't read for a
very long time during the work day because, you know, business John would be
like, no. More outreach, outreach, more meetings, and everything else like that.
So it's I think it's I think it's easy when people
see that that Maddie character. Right? And they either turn
away or they turn to it. You know, it's important to know that
depending upon the work that you're doing and your pattern and precedent and
path, Maddie was never in a situation where she didn't have that
authority. So then when it came to people who didn't know who she was, it
was already there. But I like the thing that you said, you have to
go sell your partner on it first. I think you actually have to sell yourself
on it first, because if you're if you're not yourself sold on the fact
that I am enough, my opinions and my knowledge and my experience is enough for
you to pay me on my own merit Tom my own rate. You're not
going to sell your partner on it, and you're not gonna sell anybody else on
it either. It's gonna be a lot of maybes and a whole lot of, you
know, smokescreens, which is what we call them in sales. No. That's a good
point, and there's a line
in Braveheart. Man, we're brilliant at all the movie references today. There's a line in
Braveheart where, where,
Oh gosh. I can't remember the character, but it's the old syphilitic old man. That's
in the, that's in the house, you know, I don't
remember any other. Yeah. I don't remember. It doesn't Robert, the Bruce's father. That's
who it was. And, Robert, the Bruce is like, I want to go off with
basically, basically, I want to go off with the Braveheart. I wanna go off with
Mel Gibson because he fights and he's uncompromising
and the father goes, yeah, it's easy to admire uncompromising
men, but you have been passed land and title because you
compromise. And when I was
15 maybe and saw that movie, I was like, I
said it. I remember I said inside myself, yeah, I'm gonna go off and be
on compromise. I'm
gonna be 45 this year, kids. I guess I might as well publicly announce that.
I would never thought I would say that out loud.
And, you know, after 30 years,
I see Robert the Bruce's father's point.
Same. Now with that being
said, I believe that sometimes
compromise and I've, I've, I've said this in a couple of different podcast episodes, episodes,
couple of different episodes I think in America, we don't know how to hit the
center of the target on much of anything politically, culturally, socially. We
swing wildly back and forth, and we have for numbers of years. Tom might actually
just be part of our national character. It seems to be such a thing with
us. Right? We all waffle a bit. Oh my god. We're all over the place.
We wanna have it essays and both ways and up and down and side to
side. Mhmm. And maybe that's because of
the conceit and the creed of freedom that just so runs
through, through our, through our, our, our national, our
national documents and international character. Okay.
Freedom to engage in hedonic pleasure, but also freedom to be accountable and responsible and
the, the ambush, and they meet Quincy and moon
and, and those kinds of guys. Right. Look. Cause, so those, those are sort of
that little group waiting for Ned pepper is sort of representative of,
I think that was Charles Portis's dig at the 19 sixties radicals, actually.
Like you're gonna be, you're gonna be these people who are gonna like, just wait
and change the world. Well, like, he doesn't like hippies. This. Yeah. No. He does
not like hippies. And they're kinda and they're kind of the hippies of that book.
Right? Because they're not they're not they're not part of, like, normal society with,
like, the marshals and everything, or they're not, like, really bad because they're
because they're still young. You know? They've not, like, actually turned to a life of
crime yet. Yet. I had not really thought about that. But, you
know, that really is kind of the first part in the book to where her
momentum in and of itself is not enough for things to make sense.
Right. And they are and they aren't convinced in any kind
of way that her momentum has any authority
whatsoever. And it's really interesting because
regard I'm gonna frame it this way. Regardless of what you may think of what
has happened over the last 4 years
since COVID Mhmm. One of the
more interesting responses by Americans,
and I really didn't think I knew there were going to be,
I knew there was going to be a slice of America that would do this,
but I didn't realize what the percentages would be. The numbers is always the
issue. Writers. What are the numbers? Right. I didn't realize that there was a
sizable chunk of Americans who were just going to pull
a rooster Cogburn or a,
Well, no, we'll use rooster Cogburn who we're just gonna pull a rooster Cogburn and
go, those guys back east don't know what they're doing. We're gonna do whatever the
hell we want. And I didn't because that's
that's also part of that freedom piece. That's part of the slice. It's
all embedded in there. It's and it comes from, honestly, we talked
about this last year on the podcast with the Rollo Jesan. We were talking about,
the, the declaration of independence and the federalist papers and the anti federalist
papers. So the person who was the leading Anti Federalist
charge was Patrick Henry. Patrick Henry didn't
trust the founding fathers. He was actually invited to go to the constitutional
convention. This is an interesting historical thing. He was invited to go to the constitutional
convention by Thomas Jefferson because Thomas Jefferson couldn't go because he was over in, over
in France. Mhmm. And Patrick Henry wouldn't go because
he, quote, unquote, smelled a rat.
And by the way, that's the anarcho libertarian strain in
America, and we talked about it on podcast, Rolo and I. And that's the kind
of people who go up into the Kentucky mountains and you leave them
alone. Just leave them alone. Just leave
those people alone. Right? They're they're book crap crazy
sometimes. You know, their their principles don't line up with logic or reality,
and they all will all fight their cousins. And God help you if you go
and you turn up the Sorrells or that hornet's nest Yep. Because then they'll all
turn and start fighting you. Yep. And I thought that
that strain around COVID had actually been
bred out of Americans, and I was shocked to discover
that it was still there. Because because to me, from my perspective,
from where I'm sitting, that's been buried for a while or it's never been it
hasn't been pushed hard enough. It it wasn't really pushed hard enough in the eighties
or in the nineties because everybody was getting rich. And then in the early 2000,
you saw a little bit of it start to show up in, ironically enough, occupy
Wall Street. Mhmm. That's where it first started to show up. And then occupy
Wall Street gradually floated over to being the Tea Party,
which gradually floated over into some other things that we're experiencing
politically in our culture right now. And and by the way, that's a strain that
unites the anarcho libertarian
writers and the socialist anarchist
left, both share the same DNA in our country, and
that's really weird for people to see. And so
you look at Maddie Ross and you look at her engaging with
the the the folks in the in the in the house, Quincy and Moon
and all of that, And they're they're it's the
19 sixties version of that sort of libertarian, a narco. We're just gonna
kinda do our thing, and we're just gonna kind of ignore you. And if you
just go away, leave us alone. We're gonna eat our soft key, and and you
can just sleep. And rooster Tom we're gonna be fine. And rooster cawburn has
nothing for any of that. He's like, no. I'm not just know.
Just know you gotta play. Just know. Yeah. And then Ned Pepper
shows up, which
ties into something that I said last year, which is, okay. You
you're you're basing your meaning on on external
authorities. That's fine. Go ahead. Base your meaning on external authorities.
What are you gonna do? And we looked at this with crime and punishment, and
we looked at this also with the Gulag Archipelago. What are you gonna do when
genuine evil shows up? Because it always does eventually.
And, like, I think I think that they do I think they do a
better version of this in the Jesan movie. Yes. Mister
Cogburn and Ned and Lucky Ned Pepper are the same
Jesan, just Yes. As a a couple of different
coin flips and decisions gone the other way. Right. And then you
have Maddie who's who's righteous. Right? I mean, she's almost like the person who
you ask, like, hey. Is it is it is it wrong to steal bread to
feed your family? And they've never been hungry before. Right? So, of course it
doesn't make any sense. You've never, like, actually had to be put to that situation.
You know? So it's this, like, philosophical knowledge that she keeps running
into around the whole thing. But, in the Jesan
book, you know, like Ned Ned is as practiced and
as competent as as Rooster, like that ain't gonna fly. You got 5
minutes, Get out of here. And he's like, we're gonna need longer than 5 minutes.
He's like, you better get going. And he goes, I'll lead him astray, I think,
for, like, 6 hours. He's like, nah. Nah. Nah.
Like, he knows where he is. He like, they're they're the same
character just Yeah. With with a black hat and a white hat.
Right. Right. And that and that also is part of the dynamic
of the, I think that's part
of the dynamic of the the 19
sixties that's playing underneath this Oh, interesting. Okay.
Underneath this, underneath this this novel and then
fundamentally underneath the first film, less so underneath
the the second film only because and this gets back to
my assertion about, you know, being post Christian. I think we've kind of
muddled we've kind of merged and muddled. And this has happened over 20 years, by
the way. We've kind of merged and muddled our meetings together, and we've kinda, like,
made it a we'll all just be a a soup kind of thing.
And then when a person like Maddie shows up and says, no. We're not
gonna be a soup. Now you're the nail that's sticking
up that's gonna get hammered down. Yep.
And, you know, again, religion is easy place to make this, but you can also
honestly, you can. We're speaking, like, well in the future. So so
all these things have kind of come true that you can't just, like, go out
and do whatever. So, you know, we're we're kinda, like, speaking, like, hey. Gravity works
when we already know that gravity is, like, very well established. Right? But, like Sure.
She's going around, right, in, like, in period, going around telling people that they need
to be law abiding citizens when no one around them is abiding by any laws,
and there's no real pressure to do so because you're days
essays away from a lawman. Right? Well, like, the the
speeches that the guys give who get hung.
Writers? At the beginning when she first shows up to a Fort Smith. Right? She
goes through a hanging. And they don't have the speeches in the first movie, which
which I thought was, like, a huge bummer. The okay. So
the other part, 2 things that I wanna make sure we talk about.
Can we talk about the weirdness of the random hanging person in the middle of
the of the forest than the second one? Yes. That is that was weird
to me. And then, you said something else that I think is very
interesting. The my wife made this comment that the John
Wayne is kinda Disneyfied, the the movie. Right? Because,
like, on the exit, she's just talking to him, and he runs off with the
horse and jumps the fence and everything else like this. Right? Whereas, like, in
the book, right, and she doesn't lose her arm Mhmm. Either. Right. Right? No. She
doesn't. Yep. I think it would be very interesting.
I think she is still that Jesan, much, much older
because of the trauma of in the in the the
life change of that injury. Right? And and then I'm sure
she carried around all, oh, yeah. You wanna make fun of me because I lost
you know what? I lost this arm doing. And then she's as bad as as
every veteran who I've who I've ever met. I'm also a veteran, so don't come
at me. Like, who wants to, like, go around wearing shirts that essays, don't mistake
my kindness for weaknesses, like some sort of weird billboard that you're tough.
Writers, book Lord, put it down, go find something
else. But like, I think, I think the Jesan book
does it or the, the, the second movie does a better job of kind of
showing that staunchness of how it plays out. But I think it plays out
because of the trauma of the injury and the righteousness that comes forward after after
a big injury like that. So I think
the application to leadership is this.
I think that
at a certain point, you have to
book, whole, right? You have to,
you have to bring all the disparate parts of yourself together.
Writers. That's a lifetime process.
And one of the things that the Jesan film
shows and the book Tom, is the struggle that Maddie
had to kind of unite
and and and and negotiate all those pieces of her. Yep.
Never had her. I never married. I never had time for it.
Right. And how she talks about it at the end of it? Exactly. People wanted
my men wanted my money, and I wasn't interested in any of that. Now, by
the way, you could read that through a feminist lens. Oh, you can read that
through a sales lens. John, we don't talk to salespeople here. You can fill out
the bid, and then we'll oh, we can't even have a conversation about what you're
really looking for. Absolutely not, John. We don't talk to salespeople before the decision step.
Like, because you just wanna sell me. No. I'm trying to figure out if I
can actually help you or not. But when you wanna see it as a sales
conversation or a guy who wants to take your money, it's going to have a
remarkably, like, very consistent effect, like, showing up that
way. Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. And you shouldn't be surprised. Imposing it.
Yeah. You shouldn't be surprised that it's showing up that way. Yeah. Whereas
in the first movie, I I find it interesting that your wife said Disney fied.
I would say the thing that was missing in
the Cohen film is the thing that makes the original,
the original how Wallace production,
robably more
loved, and it's this sense of humor. I
think that's one of the big things with that with the with the Ethan Cohen
film. The humor was kinda drained from it, like the Roger Deacon's photography.
Roger Deacon is a great cinematographer, but everything that he shoots
for, the Coen Writers is is drained of it's
drained of color. Like, everything is drained of color. Okay.
And and so I think that that that sense of humor and I think that
that was missed, by the way, because the podcast is was writing this
tongue in cheek. He actually loves these people.
Yeah. And he wants you to laugh at them and laugh with them,
and he wants it to be obviously a rye. He wants there to be some
humor in there. You know, he kinda knows he's kinda giving you the nudge and
the wink about the morality with Maddie. And, you know, he's putting her in these
kinds of situations. You don't get any of that. The, the Collins take it dead
serious. Whereas in the how Wallace production
with John Wayne, Yes. You're too old and too fat to be
jumping fences. By the way, we used to say this all the time we had
in college. One of my college buddies, he was a
smoker from Tennessee and I've never talked about him on the podcast before, but
man smoked like a Reagan chimney and he loved old
westerns. He loved, he loved all of them. And he, I mean, he knew obscure
Writers that I didn't even know about. And I thought I had like deep film
knowledge. And so we were talking about true grit one
Tom, and and we're standing outside. This is in Northern
Minnesota, and it's cold. And he's smoking, of course, because that's what he does.
And I said something to him, like something to the effect of
it's guys essays around with other guys. Right? Mhmm. I said something to him, like,
you're too old and too fat to be running around out here smoking.
And and he literally pulls the cigarette out of his mouth. He blows the cigarette
smoke all over the place. He goes, well, come by and see a fat old
man sometime. And he just walks away. That's
amazing. Like, it's so funny. Amazing. It's so
funny because, I think there
there is this weirdness of John Wayne out of time. Right?
Right. He's a he's a big personality. He's a big person. But, like,
in the movie, like, he doesn't seem so
old. Like, that was how most people were back then. Right? Like, you know, like
like, they're not going to the gym. You know? Like, the gym is your regular
chores. You know? And so If every ad in magazines was
either whiskey, cigarettes, or cars with big fins,
if you look at the magazines from, like, 1919 Yeah. 55 to, like,
1975, that's it. That's all people did in America, apparently.
Live live the lifestyle because, like, hey. No consequences for any of these
actions. You're gonna be just fine. And David Ogilvy will write all of
the copy underneath all of those ants. Yes. He will.
Absolutely, he will. But, like, in the in the newer
one, I feel like they did a better job of showing bridges, like, kinda
later in life, kinda washed out, and stuff like that.
I think the book does a really better job at kinda showing in a really
interesting way some of the insights of his backstory about, like, talking about
how all the buffalo are gone, which, is a guy who really likes Buffalo and
has one tattooed on his arm. I was like, oh, very interesting of
like tying that to a place in time. But I
think I think Bridges does the part of looking a little bit
older, disheveled kind of situation. They were,
k, I found this out, about the same age when they were filming that.
Now, apparently, Reister Cogburn is supposed to be about 40, which back in that
time, probably 40 was was like 60. But both both
Bridges and John Wayne were like late fifties. I think I think Bridges was like
actually 60 whenever he was filming the thing. If I if I remember the
data correctly. Well, he looks I mean, he does. He looks
he looks like he's Yeah. Whereas John Wayne John
Wayne's still like like, his coats and his wardrobe and everything, you know,
like, like, they're trying to make him look a little disheveled with, like, the eye
patch and everything, but, like Yeah. He's wearing that crystal clean
brown kinda like, you could you could go down to down to
north side Texas. Right? Down to north side Fort Worth, like, down the street from
me, and you would see people in Carhartt's that look exactly like that jacket. Exactly
like that jacket. Writers? So it felt very,
like, it felt very much like an old Writers movie that everyone
knows as a movie. Whereas I feel like the newer one is like, they're trying
to immerse you in it. And I think they do a better job of it,
but that one part of them being in the middle of it and seeing that
person there, and then there's, like, the the weird trapper and everything, like Mhmm.
That part. Now it only makes sense because of the plot device of having a
breakup with Libby and everything, which doesn't happen in the book and the original movie
and everything. So Yep. That to me would be a very interesting
conversation of, like, how did you decide the
thinking behind the choices with the pulls essays and the and the
things you decided to keep the same? I think that would be a very interesting
conversation. Alright.
So, we've resolved nothing. Nothing at all. Nothing at nothing at
all. And we are we are at the end of our we are at the
end of our time today. So okay. I have some
questions for you. Can I go first? Go ahead. Yeah. Go ahead. Ask me some
questions. I know. I just ruined your whole format of No. It's fine. It's fine.
The format is l below. This is what this is what makes me the best
slash worst guest. If if you were going
to sit a brand new leader down and you, and you tell them,
Hey, this is forced material. I need you to read the book. I need you
to watch the movie. I need you to watch the newer movie. Mhmm. Which one
do you do you put that person on? And let's take away the idea that
reading is a deeper comprehension level than just watching a movie. Right? Just for
how it does and tells the story. Which one do you think is the best
place for a new leader to kinda sit in?
Honestly, I would probably have them watch the Cohen film.
Same. Only but only because I
think a new leader in the year we're in contact
context. Right? I think they're going to resonate more with, with that
perception of. Of, of Maddie's
moralism, the perception of, you know, having a plan
a kind of fail and having to fall back to a plan B. I think
they're going to resonate with the idea of,
how do we assert moral authority and what does that actually look like? I think
they're going to resonate a little bit more with, the
concepts of. Particularly if I tell them a little bit
about Podcast, not, you know, linking external success and fame
to the work like we've been talking about. I also think
that, they're going to resonate with,
Jeff Bridges as rooster Cogburn, his bold actions there.
So, you know, the word grit is a word that,
Angela Duckworth made famous in the business world, but it
is a word that unfortunately due to the
course due to the passage of time, is now no longer
referenced. And I think that's very interesting
because right now, what we need, and I would in
particularly say to male leaders, particularly young male leaders, young male
leaders, and by young, I mean
18 to 34 young male
leaders need a lot of grit right now.
And I don't mean grit as an authoritarianism.
I don't mean grit as in, as in being abusive or being over
weaning. I don't mean any of that. Andrew Tate and Harvey Weinstein book
share the same DNA. Not talking about that.
I love that. I'm not talking about that. Okay. What I'm talking
about is the grit to take on ownership
and accountability for everything that is within your sphere of influence.
Yep. And to do it in spite of the fact that the slings
and arrows will come. Yeah. You're going to get that
from, understanding Charles Portis' life, understanding the
book, and understand and seeing the new movie kind of kind of, I think, delivers
that message a little bit better in a little bit better way. Yeah. But, yeah,
I would hit him with the new movie first, and then I'd be like, yeah.
You gotta go you gotta go read the book to get the whole idea here,
but that's what I would do. I agree. I'll I I think I think the
book I think the second movie does a really good job of just that juxtaposition
of, you know, everyone thinks that they can just run
around like Maddie, and it's going to work. Right? And then and then if it
and then if it's not working, you need to go do something else. Whereas what
I talk about people with is, you know, you can't force that on
on anyone. Writers? You have to meet them where they are. So
I would pick the same movie just because I, you know, I
think most people need to understand that you're gonna have
hard days as a leader. You're gonna have to go say some things that aren't
popular. You're gonna have to go let some people go that you
potentially brought onto a team. Right? And I think I think
that that second movie does a really good job of showing how you have to
live with the actions. Right? Past it. You know, you don't you don't get to
ride off on a horse and everything is okay and there's no lasting impact of
it. You know, these the everything that
made him great as far as, like, being the being the hero that she
needed leads to all of his other struggles. Right? Right. And you
have to as a leader, you have to know that you're carrying both. Right. The
greatness that is you is also attached to the things that are going to
drive some people nuts and that
that's how it has to be. Writers. No one is just going to lay
down for you all the time and people shouldn't. Right.
They're supposed to push back. You're supposed to kind of have to give a reason
and a thought behind why you're doing what you're doing. If we're not doing that,
we are tyrants. Right? We're just expecting people to run and jump and do certain
things be because we said so with no contextual reasoning
why. Well, and and and in the world that we live in today
and by the way, I'd like to thank John Hill for coming on the podcast
today. We could have talked about this book for literally hours, and and
we just began to to scrape the surface. So go pick up your own copy
of True Grit by Charles Fortis. Watch the Cohen movie.
Watch even watch the the Hal Wallis, John Wayne John Wayne film.
Take a look at that one as well, and read up a little bit on
Charles Fortis and his life and the kinds of decisions that he made.
There's a great scene at the end, and it's in the close to the end
of the book end of the 3rd act in the Jesan film,
And then the back end of the 3rd act in the first film where and
in the book where, where John Wayne,
rides out against against Ned Pepper. And Ned
Pepper challenges him. He says, you know, I I I love this line, you know,
you know, 4 against 1. Right?
You know, what's your intention? Do you think the 1 on 4 is a dog
fall? And rooster says, I need to kill you in 1 minute, Ned, or see
you hanged at Fort Smith at Judge Parker's convenience. Which will you have?
Lucky Ned Pepper laughed. He said, I call that book talk for a one eye
fat man. And, of course, rooster said, fill your
hand, you son of a bitch. Yeah.
Which, you know, he gave him some options. He gave him options. It was
not, like, as I tell everyone, as a consultant, your job is to give people
options and then help them understand the weight of those options. But
if you're running around as a coach or a consultant and people are like, they
didn't listen to all my advice. Welcome to the party. That's how it works. Right?
That's right. And honestly, that's your first learning lesson that
not everyone is gonna hear it the way that it naturally comes out of your
mouth, and you might need to put in some work and some effort into how
it needs to come out of your mouth. That way, it can be heard regularly
and consistently. Well, in the 4 that you are fighting against, the
dog fall you're fighting against in this world is the algorithm, of
course. It's social media, it's
circumstances, but it's also other people.
And book, we are supposed to engage with other people. I
fundamentally believe that in order to lead them. But we are
also supposed to have accountability for those exact same people.
We're supposed to have accountability for what they do and for what they don't do.
A non decision is still a decision. And so
even a sales guy. And I'm not even a sales guy. Like, like, you're not
even a sales guy saying that. Like, I'm like, I'm like, oh my gosh. Are
you allowed to say that? Like, but that's true. Said it out
loud. I'm gonna say it out loud. If they can't make a decision,
that's a problem. Right? That's a problem. And if if you can't figure out
that, a, if someone is just not decisive enough to make a decision versus
someone who doesn't want to wasn't to give you the decision that you want, you're
not even on the level. Like, Like, you're not you're not ready to be a
leader. You're not ready to be in sales. You're not ready to do anything else,
and you're definitely not ready to get on your high horse on LinkedIn and go
around talking about how people don't get it.
The less of that from everybody out there
and, more of listening to the Leadership Lessons from the Great Books podcast. Because
this podcast will help you
figure out where the dog fall actually is. So
once again, I'd like to thank my guests, John hill for coming on today.
Look, connect with him, connect with him as a, as a
consultant, as a consultant, connect with him on LinkedIn. We
will have links to all as usual, to all the places where you can get
ahold of him. Go buy his book. Go listen to his podcast.
Go hire him when you wanna figure out how to be a
better sales leader.
And with that, my name is Ehsan Sorels,
and we're
out.